Back to Network
7
Shared Docs
5
Same-Page
7 / 7
Mentions
Document Mentions (7 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page EFTA02857732_p13Same page
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
Page: EFTA02857732_p13 →cial sex acts in violation of Section 1591(a)(1), all in violation of Section 1594(a). Roberts contacted an undercover website promising travel to Costa Rica to meet underage prostitutes. Roberts arranged a trip with the undercover website, but then changed his mind because he did not want to travel inter
Page: EFTA02857732_p13 →2 mentions1 same-page
Page EFTA02857763_p13Same page
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
Page: EFTA02857763_p13 →sex acts in violation of Section 1591(a)(1), all in violation of Section 1594(a). _F22 Roberts contacted an undercover website promising travel to Costa Rica to meet underage prostitutes. Roberts arranged a trip with the undercover website, but then changed his mind because he did not want to travel inter
Page: EFTA02857763_p13 →2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
sex acts in violation of Section 1591(a)(1), all in violation of Section 1594(a). _FI6 Roberts contacted an undercover website promising travels to Costa Rica to meet underage prostitutes. Roberts arranged a trip with the undercover website, but then changed his mind because he did not want to travel inter
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
ial sex acts in violation of Section 1591(a)(1), all in violation of Section 1594(a). Roberts contacted an undercover website promising travels to Costa Rica to meet underage prostitutes. Roberts arranged a trip with the undercover website, but then changed his mind because he did not want to travel inter
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo I. United States, 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of ten
cial sex acts in violation of Section 1591(aX1), all in violation of Section 1594(a).23 Roberts contacted an undercover website promising travel to Costa Rica to meet underage prostitutes. Roberts arranged a trip with the undercover website, but then changed his mind because he did not want to travel inte
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857524_p23
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States, 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of t
Page: EFTA02857524_p23 →Page EFTA02857524_p24
cial sex acts in violation of Section 1591(a)(1), all in violation of Section 1594(a).' Roberts contacted an undercover website promising travel to Costa Rica to meet underage prostitutes. Roberts arranged a trip with the undercover website, but then changed his mind because he did not want to travel inte
Page: EFTA02857524_p24 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857810_p12
prove that the defendant's sole purpose for traveling and transporting the individual was to have the individual engage in illegal sexual activity. Mortensen v. United States , 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944); Crespo v. United States , 151 F.2d 44, 46 (1st Cir. 1945). This offense carries a statutory maximum of
Page: EFTA02857810_p12 →Page EFTA02857810_p13
ial sex acts in violation of Section 1591(a)(1), all in violation of Section 1594(a). Roberts contacted an undercover website promising travels to Costa Rica to meet underage prostitutes. Roberts arranged a trip with the undercover website, but then changed his mind because he did not want to travel inter
Page: EFTA02857810_p13 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (250)
Entities connected to both Mortensen and Costa Rica
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON25 w/ Mortensen·97 w/ Costa
United States
LOCATION26 w/ Mortensen·37 w/ Costa
LB
Leon Black
PERSON19 w/ Mortensen·33 w/ Costa
George W. Bush
PERSON15 w/ Mortensen·35 w/ Costa
Marc Rich
PERSON12 w/ Mortensen·31 w/ Costa
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON11 w/ Mortensen·28 w/ Costa
EV
Evans
PERSON18 w/ Mortensen·20 w/ Costa
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON10 w/ Mortensen·26 w/ Costa
Prince Andrew
PERSON7 w/ Mortensen·29 w/ Costa
Jennifer Lopez
PERSON17 w/ Mortensen·17 w/ Costa
GL
Gerald Lefcourt
PERSON14 w/ Mortensen·20 w/ Costa
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON13 w/ Mortensen·21 w/ Costa
Alexander Acosta
PERSON17 w/ Mortensen·17 w/ Costa
RB
Roy Black
PERSON14 w/ Mortensen·18 w/ Costa
Naomi Campbell
PERSON12 w/ Mortensen·19 w/ Costa
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION12 w/ Mortensen·18 w/ Costa
AS
Ann Sanchez
PERSON13 w/ Mortensen·16 w/ Costa
Julie K. Brown
PERSON4 w/ Mortensen·25 w/ Costa
New York
LOCATION9 w/ Mortensen·20 w/ Costa
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION9 w/ Mortensen·20 w/ Costa