Epstein Secrets

l court decisions watering down the "for the purpose of " requi ment fly in the face of the two Suprems Court decisions addressing that element. See Hansen'. Huff, 291 U.S. 559 (1934); Mortensen. United States, 322 U.S. 369 (1944). Santos and Cuellar speak loudly and clearly against prosecutors seeing

(213)680'8400 www.kirkland.com June 19,2008 John Roth, Esq. Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Room 4115 Washington, D.C. 20530 Dear Mr. Roth: Facsimile: (213) 6804500 Dir. Fax: (213) 6804500 I again want t

court decisions watering down the "for the purpose of " requirement fly in the face of the two Supreme Court decisions addressing that element. See Hansen v. Huff, 291 U.S. 559 (1934); Mortensen v. United States, 322 U.S. 369 (1944). Santos and Cuellar speak loudly and clearly against prosecutors seei

O. rADEARY e. MoVEY CS COUNSEL DOWSE MOIJCH June 19, 2008 Mr. Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice Dear Mr. Roth: TELEPHONE FACSRA.MIMI WRITER'S DIRECT ORR 1 write to offer my reaction to the May 15, 2008 correspondence from the United States

t to engage in sexual activity with a minor in another state. The travel must be for the purpose of engaging in the unlawful sexual act. See also Hansen,. Huff, 291 U.S. 559, 562-63 (1934) and Mortensen I. United States, 322 U.S. 369, 374 (1944) ("An intention that the women or girls shall engage in

ebruary 1962 until October 1965. One of the investigations I was responsible for was the death of Malcolm X. From 1965 until 1969 1 was employed by the United States Department of Justice in Washington as a trial attorney in the organized crime and racketeering section of the Criminal Division. I was assigned to investigate and to pr