Epstein Secrets

the facts underlying them, we see nothing in the conduct of the U.S. Attorney's Office that gives us any reason to alter our opinion. Sincerely, John Roth Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General cc: Alex Acosta EFTA00208767 LAW OFFICES ALLEN GUTHRIE MCHUGH & THOMAS, PLLC MALL EN REBECCA& OETS

of Justice Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section ("CEOS") regarding the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida (`USAO").1 I will refrain from recounting Mr. Epstein's arguments in detail here, but, rather, will highlight salient points responsive

E. McHUGH P. 0. BOX 3301 CHARLESTON, WEST VIRGINIA 25333-3394 500 LEE STREET. EAST. SMITE 800 CHARLESTON. WEST VIRGINIA 25301 June 19, 2008 Mr. John Roth Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General Office of the Deputy Attorney General United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

of Justice Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section ("CEOS") regarding the federal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein by the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida ("USAO"),I I will refrain from recounting Mr. Epstein's arguments in detail here, but, rather, will highlight salient points responsive

y Attorney General, during which Epstein's attorneys submitted additional letter briefs to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex... 25. On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General wrote to Messrs. Lefkowitz and Starr, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate.

oration, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company. (I U.S.C. § 1). 7. During 2006 to 2008, when the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida investigated Jeffrey Epstein, no criminal charge was filed against Epstein in Federal district court. Ex. S, ¶ 4. Although the U.S. Atto

Attorney General, during which Epstein's attorneys submitted additional letter briefs to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex. V. 25. On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, wrote to Messrs. Lefkowitz and Starr, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate

oration, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company. (I U.S.C. § 1). 7. During 2006 to 2008, when the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida investigated Jeffrey Epstein, no criminal charge was filed against Epstein in Federal district court. Ex. S,914. Although the U.S. Attor

Mr. Senior responded, cc'ing me, instructing me to send out that notification (Exhibit B-49). On June 23, 2008, DAG Filip completed his review, and John Roth sent a letter to Attorneys Starr and Lefkowitz stating their finding that there was no abuse of discretion and no misconduct (Exhibit B-44). I immed

Re: Jeffrey Epstein/Saige Gonzalez: NOTIFICATION OF IDENTIFIED VICTIM. Dear Mr. Leopold: • By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida asks that you provide the following notice to your client, On June 30, 2008, Jeffrey Epstein (hereinafter referred to as "Epstein) enter

258 CEOS Chief Oosterbaan told OPR this provision was “very unusual.” Principal Associate Deputy Attorney General John Roth commented, “I don’t know how it is that you give immunity to somebody who’s not identified. I just don’t know how that works.” Villafaña’s co-coun

ment has filed charges, but courts have discretion to take a more inclusive approach); and United States v. Guevara-Toloso, 2005 WL 1210982, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. May 23, 2005) (order sua sponte) (in case involving a federal charge of illegal entry after a felony conviction, the court determined that victims o