Epstein Secrets

tted additional letter briefs to the DAG and U.S. Attorney's Office submitted response letters. Ex. I DO NOT HAVE THESE LETTERS] On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General wrote to Messrs. Lefkowitz and Starr, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate.

r. Ex. S, ¶¶ 5, 13, 31. Following the entry of the NPA, Epstein challenged the United States Attorney's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion at the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. Ex. G. From January to May 2008, Epstein's attorneys submitted lengthy document

y Attorney General, during which Epstein's attorneys submitted additional letter briefs to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex... 25. On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General wrote to Messrs. Lefkowitz and Starr, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate.

pstein also raised challenges to the United States Attorney's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ in Washington, D.C. Exs. G, K, L. From late 2007 to May 2008, Epstein's attorneys attempted 6 EFTA

Attorney General, during which Epstein's attorneys submitted additional letter briefs to the Deputy Attorney General. Ex. V. 25. On June 23, 2008, John Roth, Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General, wrote to Messrs. Lefkowitz and Starr, advising them that "federal prosecution of this case is appropriate

pstein also raised challenges to the United States Attorney's exercise of his prosecutorial discretion with the Assistant Attorney General and with the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS), within the Criminal Division of the DOJ 6 EFTA00799600 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 402 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/02/2017 Page 7 of 10