Epstein Secrets

pulate that this correspondence accurately reflects communications between Epstein and the Justice Department. 8. At the time of plea discussions, AUSA Villafana had drafted an 82-page prosecution memorandum outlining federal offenses committed by Epstein (including offenses committed against Jane Doe #1 and

ween Jeffrey Epstein, represented by numerous attorneys (including lead criminal defense counsel Jay Lefkowitz), and the U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern District of Florida. The lengthy plea negotiations eventually resulted in Epstein pleading guilty to two state court felony offenses with a recommendation o

n the West Palm Beach office of the U.S. Attorney's Office, and supervised portions of the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein. 8. assisted AUSA Villafana during the criminal investigation of.leffrey Epstein. 9. In his revious capacity as Deputy Chief of the Criminal Division, U.S. Attorney's Office

time the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein was opened, and the non-prosecution agreement was negotiated. 5. was the federal prosecutor in the Southern District of Florida assigned primary responsibility for the federal criminal investigation of Epstein during the time when that criminal investigation was o

component was involved in the process. For example, at the end of 2006, former SDFL U.S. Attorney and EOUSA Executive Director Guy Lewis contacted AUSA Villafana when he learned that she was handling the federal investigation of Epstein. He asked to meet with her but she said that she believed such a meeting

in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who, while minors, were victims

component was involved in the process. For example, at the end of 2006, former SDFL U.S. Attorney and EOUSA Executive Director Guy Lewis contacted AUSA Villafana when he learned that she was handling the federal investigation of Epstein. He asked to meet with her but she said that she believed such a meeting

in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who, while minors, were victims

in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida . . . ." See In re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08- 80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.) (D.E. 14), Decl. of AUSA Villafana, 07/09/08, ¶ 5, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (emphasis added). Under the Agreement, the USAO presently retains the continuing right to indict Mr

ion into allegations arising out of the same incidents alleged in the instant action (Grand Jury No. 07-103 (WPB), United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida) ("the Federal Criminal Action"). In September 2007, the USAO and Mr. Epstein entered into a highly unusual and unprecedented deferred-

never, ever, ever, no, never. Jeffrey is an awesome man, no. At the end of her interview, [LM] was asked if she had any questions for the agents or AUSA Villafana. [LM] responded: A. No, but I hope — I hope Jeffrey, nothing happens to Jeffrey because he's an awesome man and it would really be a shame. It's a

ed Complaint in Razorback 1 The following facts are well documented by media reports, criminal case files from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, civil case filings from the Florida circuit courts and the pleadings and discovery in the instant case. 2 Although Epstein's subjective

component was involved in the process. For example, at the end of 2006, former SDFL U.S. Attorney and EOUSA Executive Director Guy Lewis contacted AUSA Villafana when he learned that she was handling the federal investigation of Epstein. He asked to meet with her but she said that she believed such a meeting

in the federal investigation file suit pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 2255, Epstein will not contest the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida over his person and the subject matter. Epstein will not contest that the identified victims are persons who, while minors, were victims

in favor of prosecution by the State of Florida . . . ." See In re: Jane Doe, Case No. 08- 80736-CIV-Marra/Johnson (S.D. Fla.) (D.E. 14), Decl. of AUSA Villafana, 07/09/08, ¶ 5, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (emphasis added). Under the Agreement, the USAO presently retains the continuing right to indict Mr

ion into allegations arising out of the same incidents alleged in the instant action (Grand Jury No. 07-103 (WPB), United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida) ("the Federal Criminal Action"). In September 2007, the USAO and Mr. Epstein entered into a highly unusual and unprecedented deferred-