Epstein Secrets

ng the admission pro hoc vice of proposed intervenor attomcyJ ay Lefkowitz within the next few days, as soon as a certificate of good standing from the New York Bar arrives. Attorneys Black, Weinberg and Lcfkowitz do not seek intervention to litigate whether the Crime Victims' Rights Act was violated and if so,

d by the government arc subject to a protective order prohibiting their disclosure. In the related case 9:08-CV-80893 (the case where Jane Doe I and Jane Doe 2 sued Mr. Epstein for money), the Magistrate Judge prohibited Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 EFTA00177187 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 56 Entered on

. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2, Plaintiffs, 1. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. NOTICE OF' OBJECTION Petitioners Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 have moved for disclosure of settlement letters between the U.S. Attorney's Office and the lawyers who represented Jeffrey Epstein du

AM Document 56 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/07/2011 Page 2 of 19 Non-Prosecution Agreement reached between the U.S. Attorney's Office and Mr. Epstein. Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doc 2 also seek other unspecified relief, which they call "appropriate remedies," for the government's purported failure to keep them invol

's approach :0 ttsrrorism almost sug- gesti: "he's wishing that this boentry would be at- tackle again, in order to make his point." Panetta told The New Yorker for an article in its June 22 issue that Cheney "smons some blood in the water' on the issue of na- tionaisecurity. Cheney has said in Panetta

on as a teen and sexually abused. Prominent Miami at- torney Robert Josefsberg filed the most recent federal lawsuit last week, on behalf of the Jane Doe 101 who allegedly visited Epstein a few times while 17 years old and was paid S200 at least once for her time there, according to the complaint.

bmission, two instances are particularly troubling. First, the USAO authorized the public disclosure of specific details of the open investigation to the New York Times—including descriptions of the prosecution’s theory of the case and specific terms of a plea " negotiation between the parties. Second, AUSA Vi

in the former firm of Herman, Sloman, & Mermelstein, filed five lawsuits, each asking for $50 million, against Mr. Epstein. Each lawsuit is entitled “Jane Doe # vs. Jeffrey Epstein,” despite the fact that each of the plaintiffs is an adult and not entitled to plead anonymously. See Tab 32, Examples of Feder

her back atis y- fabulous world that he Brooklyn boy knew not taught Epstein the differ But despite—or was il Epstein, she, too, gradi According to Jane Doe : | filed in 2009 by a womart Ly of the services Maxwell ment of underage wom papers, Maxwell has ve Virginia, with any othe with, or with any crim

night included Chelsea Han- dler, George Stephanopoulos, Charlie Rose, Katie Couric, and Woody Allen. At around the same time, Jeffrey Epstein told the New York Post, “I’m not a sexual predator, I’m an ‘offender: It’s the differ- ence between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel.” Was it so remarkable t

night included Chelsea Han- dler, George Stephanopoulos, Charlie Rose, Katie Couric, and Woody Allen. At around the same time, Jeffrey Epstein told the New York Post, “I’m not a sexual predator, I’m an ‘offender’ It’s the differ- ence between a murderer and a person who steals a bagel.” Was it so remarkable t

rt in the lawsuit. : But then, the allegations m Jane Doe 3 is Virginia Roberts, the girl who says that Ghi

Florida, and/or the Northern District of Georgia (or FBI agents working therewith). and Exchange Commission; the Department of Homeland Security; the New York [City] Police Department; the Manhattan District Attorney's Office; the State Attorney's Office for the 15th Judicial District in and for Palm Beac

s summary judgment order and proposed remedies in Jane Doe v. United States, No. 08-cv-80736 (S.D.FI.). To