Epstein Secrets

ll me. Yours sincerely, Jay P. Lefkowitz JPI:kk Enclosures (12,q1 IC> Chkago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington. ■ EFTA00315367 November 3. 2010 Jeffrey Epstein c/o Darren Indyke KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP NC AMIJATED PARTNEFtSIEPS 601 Lexington A

e case background and upcoming meetings in preparation for SORA hearing. 9/17/10 .50 Matthew 0 Solum Telephone conference with J. Lefkowitz and M. Weinberg re Reporting Outline Issues. 9/21/10 1.00 Sandra L Musumeci Review and analyze memorandum and materials re SORA calculation. 9/21/10 2.50 Jay P

please do not hesitate to call me. Yours sincerely, JPL:kk Enclosures Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington. ■ EFTA00312648 November 3. 2010 Jeffrey Epstein / rr n n k KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP ANU MHIIN I U PAK t NE RSIIIPS Inv.# IN THE MA

case background and upcoming meetings in preparation for SORA hearing. 9/17/10 Matthew 0 Solum .50 Telephone conference with J. Lefkowitz and M. Weinberg re Reporting Outline Issues. 9/21/10 Sandra L Musumeci 1.00 Review and analyze memorandum and materials re SORA calculation. 9/21/10 Jay P Lefk

uss at the Court's convenience. Respectfully submitted, Lefkowitz, P.C. Chicago Hong Kong Lor1000 Los Angeles Memel Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington. 0 C. EFTA00231523 A78 Letter from Supreme Court to Sex Offender Registry Unit Enclosing Final Determinations, dated January 19, 201

pist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).1 Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he has

s at the Court's convenience. Respe» fully submitted, . Lefkowitz, P.C. Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington. O. C. EFTA00232643 A78 Letter from Supreme Court to Sex Offender Registry Unit Enclosing Final Determinations, dated January 19, 20

pist whose primary residence is in the U.S. Virgin Islands and who also maintains vacation properties in New York and Florida. See A.53 (Letter of M. Weinberg of Aug. 16, 2010).1 Appellant does not live in New York, and since the commission of the Florida offense that forms the basis of this matter, he has