ible remedy under the act. The court then ruled that we were entitled to review the correspondence, rejecting all of Epstein’s arguments. On Friday, the 11th Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling that we could review the plea correspondence. At pp. 18-22 of its published opinion, the court concluded that th

ant precedent that federal prosecutors can’t keep victims in the dark about the plea deals that they reach. Here are the important facts, taken from the 11th Circuit's opinion: The case arose in 2006, the FBI began investigating allegations that wealthy investor Jeffrey Epstein had sexually abused dozens and dozens

circuits had addressed or commented on the issue. The Sixth Circuit, in United States v. Causey, held that good cause

er that Person A taking the Fifth can be used as evidence against Person B? A. Yeah, we are sitting here in the -- let's see, we are in Florida, in the 11th Circuit, and that is -- there's 11th circuit case law that allows that to happen. I could give you the citation, you know, in ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERS