purposely availed itself of the privilege of conducting business within the forum State, thus invoking the protec- tion and benefits of its laws.'" Pennzoil Prods. Co. F Colelli & Assocs., Inc., 149 F.3d 197, 203 (3d Cir.1998). A plaintiff can meet this burden in one of two ways: EFTA00187468 568 2

Doe Action as the basis for his argument that he too is similarly entitled to production of the Epstein interview for use in the Ponzi Scheme $ As Pennzoil and Sheehan illustrate, where (as here) a party files a New York proceeding seeking discovery of newsgathering material from a New York news organiz

t purposely availed itself of the privilege of conducting business within the forum State, thus invoking the protection and benefits of its laws.'" Pennzoil Prods. Co. v. Colelli & Assocs., Inc., 149 F.3d 197, 203 (3d Cir. 1998). A plaintiff can meet this burden in one of two ways: by establishing spec

over the company. The required public disclosure of this, on top of the tripartite agreement and co-trustee lawsuit before, was blood in the water. Pennzoil launched a hostile takeover bid in December. My concern was that the trust should not be locked in a minority position. | met with Pennzoil in New Yo