What role did the United States Attorney's Office play in the Epstein case?

The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, led by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, investigated Epstein for federal sex crimes involving underage girls but ultimately negotiated a controversial non-prosecution agreement in 2008. Documents show that Epstein and his attorneys "corresponded constantly" with the USAO to avoid federal felony charges. The agreement, finalized on June 30, 2008, allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and serve 13 months in county jail instead of facing federal sex trafficking charges that could have resulted in life imprisonment.

Why was the USAO's handling of Epstein controversial?

The USAO's handling was controversial for several reasons: the office granted Epstein immunity from all federal charges despite evidence involving more than 30 teenage victims; prosecutors kept the deal secret from victims until after it was finalized, which a federal judge later ruled violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act; and a DOJ review found the agreement was "unusual and problematic" and approved prematurely before "significant investigative steps were completed." The agreement also provided immunity to four named co-conspirators and any unnamed "potential co-conspirators," which was considered unprecedented.

What was the non-prosecution agreement the USAO made with Epstein?

The non-prosecution agreement (NPA) was a deal between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office that deferred all federal criminal prosecution against him. In exchange, Epstein agreed to plead guilty to two state charges (solicitation of prostitution and procurement of minors to engage in prostitution) in Palm Beach County court. He received an 18-month sentence but served less than 13 months with work-release privileges. The NPA also granted immunity from federal prosecution to Epstein's co-conspirators and required Epstein to register as a sex offender and pay restitution to victims identified by the FBI.

What role did the United States Attorney's Office play in the Epstein case?

The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, led by U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta, investigated Epstein for federal sex crimes involving underage girls but ultimately negotiated a controversial non-prosecution agreement in 2008. Documents show that Epstein and his attorneys "corresponded constantly" with the USAO to avoid federal felony charges. The agreement, finalized on June 30, 2008, allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and serve 13 months in county jail instead of facing federal sex trafficking charges that could have resulted in life imprisonment.

Why was the USAO's handling of Epstein controversial?

The USAO's handling was controversial for several reasons: the office granted Epstein immunity from all federal charges despite evidence involving more than 30 teenage victims; prosecutors kept the deal secret from victims until after it was finalized, which a federal judge later ruled violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act; and a DOJ review found the agreement was "unusual and problematic" and approved prematurely before "significant investigative steps were completed." The agreement also provided immunity to four named co-conspirators and any unnamed "potential co-conspirators," which was considered unprecedented.

What was the non-prosecution agreement the USAO made with Epstein?

The non-prosecution agreement (NPA) was a deal between Epstein and the U.S. Attorney's Office that deferred all federal criminal prosecution against him. In exchange, Epstein agreed to plead guilty to two state charges (solicitation of prostitution and procurement of minors to engage in prostitution) in Palm Beach County court. He received an 18-month sentence but served less than 13 months with work-release privileges. The NPA also granted immunity from federal prosecution to Epstein's co-conspirators and required Epstein to register as a sex offender and pay restitution to victims identified by the FBI.

Back to People & Entities

the United States Attorney’s Office

Organization

Also known as:

the United States Attorney's Officethe United States Attorney’sthe United States Attorney’s Officethe United States Attorney’s Office

Total Mentions

Documents

154

Connected Entities

Organization referenced in documents

The United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, led by Alexander Acosta, negotiated a controversial non-prosecution agreement (NPA) with Epstein in 2008 that allowed him to avoid federal charges in exchange for a state plea deal. Documents show Epstein's attorneys corresponded constantly with the USAO to avoid federal felony charges.

The USAO appears throughout documents as the federal prosecutor's office that conducted an investigation into Epstein's crimes involving underage girls but ultimately agreed to defer federal prosecution through the June 30, 2008 NPA. Multiple documents reference how Epstein's defense team communicated extensively with the USAO to negotiate the agreement, which required him to plead guilty to state prostitution charges while receiving immunity from federal charges. Court records and victim notifications reference the USAO's role in investigating Epstein's background while simultaneously working toward the controversial deal. A federal judge later ruled the USAO violated the Crime Victims' Rights Act by not notifying victims before finalizing the agreement.

Key Highlights

•Negotiated the 2008 non-prosecution agreement that allowed Epstein to avoid federal sex trafficking charges
•Documents show Epstein's attorneys 'corresponded constantly' with the USAO to avoid federal felony charges
•The USAO conducted federal investigations alongside FBI while simultaneously negotiating the plea deal
•Later found to have violated Crime Victims' Rights Act by keeping the deal secret from victims
•DOJ review determined the USAO used 'poor judgment' and approved the deal before completing significant investigative steps

Frequently Asked Questions

Books for Further Reading

Perversion of Justice: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

Julie K. Brown

Investigative journalism that broke the Epstein case open

Filthy Rich: The Jeffrey Epstein Story

James Patterson

Bestselling account of Epstein's crimes and network

Relentless Pursuit: My Fight for the Victims of Jeffrey Epstein

Bradley J. Edwards

Victims' attorney's firsthand account

Document Mentions (11)

Edwards'sNov2011StatementofUndisputedFacts.pdf

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010566 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010608

Nov 4, 2011Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

did in fact believe that Epstein and his attorneys knew of the seriousness of the criminal investigation against him and corresponded constantly with the United States Attorney’s Office in an attempt to avoid the filing of numerous federal felony offenses, which effort was successful. See Correspondence from U.S. Attorney’s Office to

Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010569 →

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010723 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010731

Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

the accusations being made against Mr. Epstein by the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (“USAO”). Moreover, CEOS did not assess

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010732 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010734

Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

ed for integrity in the enforcement of federal criminal laws, and (ii) the profound questions raised by the unprecedented extension of federal law by the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “USAO”) to a prominent public figure who has close ties to former President Clinton. The need for review is now all the more exigent.

Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010732 →

Sponsored

Defendant's Response in Opposition_20140117_144009853_0000.pdf

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013304 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013402

Jan 17, 2014Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

e and did in fact believe that Epstein and his attorneys knew of the seriousness of the criminal investigation — him and corresponded constantly with the United States Attorney’s Office in an attempt to avoid the filing of numerous federal felony offenses, which effort was successful. See Correspondence from U.S. Attorney’s Office to

Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013323 →

KMBT_C654e-20190114185410

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016420 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016505

Jan 14, 2019Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

ged by Epstein’s lawyers to victim notifications, the [United States Attorney’s Office] reevaluated its obligations to provide notificat

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019221 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019223

Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019221 →

Sponsored

Exhibit 08.pdf

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021145 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021215

Aug 18, 2016Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

out let alone talk about with them for the first time since I had started my entire life over. His next response left me nothing short of speechless. The United States Attorney’s Office for the district of Florida was giving me a notification of being an identified victim. Jeffrey was finally caught for his atrocious acts of perversi

Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021213 →

IMG_1339.jpg

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022211

Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

d by Epstein’s law- yers to victim notifications, the [United States Attomey’s Office] reevaluated its obligations to provide notificat

2008-05-19 - Ltr Starr and Whitley to Filip.pdf

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025353 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025360

Sep 8, 2011Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

the accusations being made against Mr. Epstein by the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (““USAO”). Moreover, CEOS did not assess

Sponsored

CPY Document Subject

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025704 - HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025706

Source: House Oversight Committee

1 mention

Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025704 →

099.pdf

DOJ-COURT-099

Source: DOJ First Production

1 mention

A. v. Epstein and Kellen, case no. 08- 80811 (attached). Epstein moves for a stay until the expiration of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) with the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) because, he claims, the USAO has taken the position that he is violating the NPA by defending the civil actions filed against him. Therefore,

Sponsored