did in fact believe that Epstein and his attorneys knew of the seriousness of the criminal investigation against him and corresponded constantly with the United States Attorney’s Office in an attempt to avoid the filing of numerous federal felony offenses, which effort was successful. See Correspondence from U.S. Attorney’s Office to

the accusations being made against Mr. Epstein by the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (“USAO”). Moreover, CEOS did not assess

ed for integrity in the enforcement of federal criminal laws, and (ii) the profound questions raised by the unprecedented extension of federal law by the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “USAO”) to a prominent public figure who has close ties to former President Clinton. The need for review is now all the more exigent.

ney’s Office has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation of prostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney’s Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation into Epstein’s background and any offenses that may have been committe

e and did in fact believe that Epstein and his attorneys knew of the seriousness of the criminal investigation — him and corresponded constantly with the United States Attorney’s Office in an attempt to avoid the filing of numerous federal felony offenses, which effort was successful. See Correspondence from U.S. Attorney’s Office to

ged by Epstein’s lawyers to victim notifications, the [United States Attorney’s Office] reevaluated its obligations to provide notificat

ed for integrity in the enforcement of federal criminal laws, and (ii) the profound questions raised by the unprecedented extension of federal law by the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “USAO”) to a prominent public figure who has close ties to former President Clinton. The need for review is now all the more exigent.

out let alone talk about with them for the first time since I had started my entire life over. His next response left me nothing short of speechless. The United States Attorney’s Office for the district of Florida was giving me a notification of being an identified victim. Jeffrey was finally caught for his atrocious acts of perversi

d by Epstein’s law- yers to victim notifications, the [United States Attomey’s Office] reevaluated its obligations to provide notificat

the accusations being made against Mr. Epstein by the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (““USAO”). Moreover, CEOS did not assess

ed for integrity in the enforcement of federal criminal laws, and (ii) the profound questions raised by the unprecedented extension of federal law by the United States Attorney’s Office in Miami (the “USAO”) to a prominent public figure who has close ties to former President Clinton. The need for review is now all the more exigent.

ht the case was over, until we learned that the local police were not satisfied with this resolution and were bringing the matter to the attention of the United States Attorney’s Office, thus turning it into a federal case. The federal statutes governing sexual contact with underage girls are draconian. Had my client been convicted

A. v. Epstein and Kellen, case no. 08- 80811 (attached). Epstein moves for a stay until the expiration of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”) with the United States Attorney’s Office (USAO) because, he claims, the USAO has taken the position that he is violating the NPA by defending the civil actions filed against him. Therefore,

orney’s Office has charged Epstein by indictment with solicitation ofprostitution, in violation of Florida Statutes Section 796.07; IT APPEARING that the United States Attorney’s Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have conducted their own investigation into Epstein’s background and any offenses that may have been committe