hat document additional credibility, in fact, allegations appearing in such documents might be less credible than those published elsewhere.J9 46 Front, Inc. V. Khalil, 24 N.Y.3d 713, 718, 4 N.Y.S.3d 581, 28 N.E.3d 15 (2015); see also Kelly v. Albarino, 485 F.3d 664, 666 (2d Cir. 2007) (adopting the rea

d that document additional credibility, in fact, allegations appearing in such documents might be less credible than those published elsewhere" 46 Front, Inc. v. Khalil, 24 N.Y.3d 713, 718 (2015); see also Kelly v. Albarino, 485 F.3d 664, 666 (2d Cir. 2007) (adopting the reasoning of the District Court exp

ssed EFTA00591584 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 25 Filed 12/28/15 Page 9 of 13 defamation complaints based on a qualified privilege. See, e.g., Front, Inc. v. Khalil, 24 N.Y.3d 713 (N.Y. 2015) (affirming motion to dismiss based on pre-litigation qualified privilege); Orenstein v. Figel, 677 F.Supp.2d 7

918) 8 EFTA00595585 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 15 Filed 12/01/15 Page 4 of 29 Frechtman v. Gutterman, 979 N.Y.S.2d 58 (1st Dep't 2014) 14 Front, Inc. v. Khalil, 24 N.Y.3d 713, 720 (2015) 13 Fuji Photo Film U.S.A., Inc. v. McNulty, 669 F.Supp.2d 405 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) 8 Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.,