ME NOW the Plaintiffs, Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J., LLC, by and through their undersigned counsel, Hodge & Francois, and move this Court, pursuant to Super. Ct. R. 10(a)(2) and LRCi 7.3 for an enlargement of time within which to file Plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of this Court's Order, entered May

Defendant to file its Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss after the expiration of the specified period as required by Super. Ct. R. 10(a)(2), nor do the multiple motions and letter justify the filing of an Amended Reply. Defendant's Amended Reply was filed in violation of LR

to the contrary). 5. For our limited purposes to point, the only Superior Court Rule arguably contrary to Fed. R. Civ. P. 1-19 and LRCi 1-12.1, is Super. Ct. R. 9, excluding intervening weekends and holidays from the calculations for periods of eleven (11) days or less.2 6. The Court's Memorandum Opinio