ed and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO") enforcement action against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and several Epstein-controlled entities before the Superior Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands. See Exhibit A hereto (USVI's operative First Amended Complaint, filed February 11, 2020). Access to other judicial docu

ed and Corrupt Organizations Act ("CICO") enforcement action against the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein and several Epstein-controlled entities before the Superior Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands. See Exhibit A hereto (USVI's operative First Amended Complaint, filed February 11, 2020). Access to other judicial docu

arial, [and] confidential" basis.2' For example, the EVCP operates "entirely free from any interference or control by the Epstein " Ex. G (order of the Superior Court of t1 lit• in Islands Division of St. ( Virgin dated June 2, 2020); see Ex. A ¶¶ 8, 13 Decl.). " Ex. C (6/25/20 Press Release). 16 Maxwell's Mo

Filed 02/10/21 Page 2 of 6 Epstein's and Ms. Maxwell's alleged sexual abuse of Plaintiff. Defendants did not file counterclaims. On June 2, 2020, the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands granted the Co- Executors' motion to establish the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, a voluntary independen

er situated...to the then acting Trustees of The 1953 Trust." 67. On August 26, 2019, Defendant Darren K. Indyke filed a Certificate of Trust with the Superior Court for the Virgin Islands, confirming that he and Defendant Richard D. Kahn are the two Trustees of The 1953 Trust. See Certificate of Trust, In the Ma

3 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 31. On August 26, 2019, Defendant Darren K. Indyke filed a Certificate of Trust with the Superior Court for the Virgin Islands, confirming that he and Defendant Richard D. Kahn arc the two Trustees of The 1953 Trust. 32. On September 6, 2019, Magistr

er Office of Federal Financial Management Office of Management and Budget, Ebony M. Scott, of the District of Columbia, to be an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of the EFTA00160896 District of Columbia and Donald Walker Tunnage of the District of Columbia to be an Associate Judge of the Superior Court of

t' the U.S. Attorneys Office, the U.S. Marshal Service, the Bureau of Corrections, the VI Department of Health. VI Department of Human ServiceS, the Superior Court. the Office of Probation and Parole arid the Sex- ual Registry Board. "Since July of 2009, the. Virgin Islands SORNA Task Force, spear- headed by

d Fancelli are participating in the Meeting for purposes of engaging in settlement discussions in connection with ongoing litigation taking place in the Superior Court of the United States Virgin Islands in the case of Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J., LLC, as Plaintiffs, v. Fancelli Paneling, Inc., as Defendant, and J.

intiffs' pleading, the First Amended Complaint does not provide any reference to the statutory underpinnings for the subject matter jurisdiction of the Superior Court, 4 V.I.C.§ 76, nor should it be Defendant's responsibility to select Plaintiffs' best weapon in this regard for any response. Subject matter jurisdi

f among the existing parties." 7 Superior Court Rule 7 states that "the practice and procedure in the Superior Court shall be governed by Rules of the Superior Court and, to the extent not inconsistent therewith, by the Rules of the District Cowl, the Ocderal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Federal Rules of Crimina

. ST-10-O4443 4. The undersigned counsel's office has either an office employee or an independent courier check the Hodge & Francois "mailbox- at the Superior Court at least once a day, and as of May 26, 2011 the undersigned counsel had not received any Orders or the Memorandum Opinion from the Court that the d

aintiffs FAC and the exhibits attached thereto. 2. Plaintiffs Have Filed Their Lawsuit in the Proper Venue: The St. Thomas and St. John Division of the Superior Court. Defendant also suggests that this case be dismissed because the venue is improper. "To survive a motion to dismiss for improper venue, the plainti

New Jersey, without regard to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof. The Parties hereto irrevocably consent to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Superior Court located in Essex County, New Jersey, or the Federal District Court sitting in Newark, New Jersey, in connection with any action or proceeding arisi

cer of the Economic Development Commission. 12 Section 11 removes the Governor from possibly being a litigant in a judicial review 13 action, and the Superior Court replaces the District Court for judicial review of an 14 unfavorable decision by the Commission. 15 Section 12 removes the Governor's authority t

mmittee's recommendation shall be mailed to the parties, and members of CAFT. The president's decision shall include a statement that an appeal to the Superior Court pursuant to the Administrative Review Act, A.R.S. §12-901 et. seq., if desired, must be filed within thirty- five (35) days from the date when a cop

mmittee's recommendation shall be mailed to the parties, and members of CAFT. The president's decision shall include a statement that an appeal to the Superior Court pursuant to the Administrative Review Act, A.R.S. §12-901 et. seq., if desired, must be filed within thirty- five (35) days from the date when a cop

or any parole proceeding." § 3771(a)(4). The use of the term "district court" clearly indicates Congress was referring to U.S. District Courts, and the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. § 3771(e)(3), and the review process in the federal courts of appeal, § 3771(d)(3), (e)(1), confirms that the court pr

or any parole proceeding." § 3771(a)(4). The use of the term "district court" clearly indicates Congress was referring to U.S. District Courts, and the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. § 3771(e)(3), and the review process in the federal courts of appeal, § 3771(d)(3), (e)(1), confirms that the court pr

regarding conflict of laws. The Company and each of the Members agree to submit to personal jurisdiction and to waive any objection as to venue in the Superior Court or the United States District Court located in 15 EFTA00809818 St. Thomas in the United States Virgin Islands. Service of process on the Company