ain eunla wais magma enaa• mtnizaeav • ex:Aalcii0V14. • 07127)2009 N1JP ININIMEntegae, eigfiLSIMAall VOIIMMWAratawmago Drafting }triply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss in Jane Doe, research regarding same NEW gsgzemr em011etWAW SEIWO onnost StiSew ESP tetreivs, Wm, SW SW cos 74rait;thr 1.20 hr

pprovals was filed the following day.3 See page 4 of Defendant's Motion to File Out of Time and For Acceptance Nunc Pro Tune of Defendant's Reply to Opposition to Motion to Dismiss with Points and Authorities. 4 EFTA00308342 Plaintifil • Opposition to Defendant's Motion For Leave to File Amended Reply Epstein el

party" status to "Molyneux Sudio," rather than to "Molyneux," which is the collective term defined by Plaintiffs (First Amended Complaint, ¶4, p.2; Opposition to Motion to Dismiss, p.8, and Affidavit in support of Motion to Reconsider, p.2), Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, p.2, and the Court by Memorandum Opinion (p.

09. (I03) (Entered: 05/14/2009) 05/18/2009 109 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to (39 in 9:08-cv-80994-KAM) Response in Opposition to Motion, (40 in 9:08-cv-80994-KAM) Response in Opposition to Motion by Jeffrey Epstein. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Pike, Michael) (Entered:

009. (Ic3) (Entered: 05/14/2009) 05/18/2009 61 Defendant's MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply as to (39 in 9:08-cv-80994-KAM) Response in Opposition to Motion, (40 in 9:08-cv-80994-KAM) Response in Opposition to Motion by Jeffrey Epstein. Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Pike, Michael) (Entered:

https://ecf.flsd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DIctRpt.p17482840805650403-L_801_0-1 6/9/2009 EFTA00175608 CM/ECF - Live Database - flsd Page 21 of 21 in Opposition to Motion, 11,1 Plaintiffs MOTION Plaintiffi Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe 102's Motion for No-Contact Order, a Defendant's MOTION to Compel Identity of Doe