18
Total Mentions
18
Documents
313
Connected Entities
Surname reference in documents
EFTA00177793
refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 501, which "empower[s] the federal courts to `continue the evolutionary development of [evidentiary] privileges." Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 47 (1980). The "central feature" of Rule 410 "is
EFTA00205360
refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 50!, which "empower[s] the federal courts to `continue the evolutionary development of [evidentiary] privileges.' Adkins g Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th 2007), quoting Trammel I United States, 445 U.S. 40, 47 (1980). The "central feature" of Rule 41001s that t
EFTA00205340
refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 50!, which "empower[s] the federal courts to `continue the evolutionary development of [evidentiary] privileges.' Adkins g Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th 2007), quoting Trammel I United States, 445 U.S. 40, 47 (1980). The "central feature" of Rule 41001s that t
EFTA00209385
le of Evidence 501 is a mixed question of 7 EFTA00209391 Case: 13-12923 Date Wit H4118/2014 Page: 8 of 23 law and fact that we review de novo. Adkins'. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1327 (11th Cir. 2007). But we review for clear error factual findings made by a district court. Morrissette-Brown'. Mobi
EFTA00209426
le of Evidence 501 is a mixed question of 7 EFTA00209432 Case: 13-12923 Date Wit H4118/2014 Page: 8 of 23 law and fact that we review de novo. Adkins'. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1327 (11th Cir. 2007). But we review for clear error factual findings made by a district court. Morrissette-Brown'. Mobi
EFTA00209632
of Evidence 501 is a mixed question of 7 EFTA00209638 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 8 of 23 law and fact that we review de novo. Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1327 (11th Cir. 2007). But we review for clear error factual findings made by a district court. Morrissette-Brown v. Mo
EFTA00209657
MPLIANCE 60 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 61 iii EFTA00209662 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 08/05/2013 Page: 7 of 75 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324 (11th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 552 U.S. 1131 (2008) 6, 30, 33, 45 Baker v. Secretary, U.S. Dep't of Transportation, 45
EFTA00209741
of Evidence 501 is a mixed question of 7 EFTA00209747 Case: 13-12923 Date Filed: 04/18/2014 Page: 8 of 23 law and fact that we review de novo. Adkins' Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1327 (11th Cir. 2007). But we review for clear error factual findings made by a district court. Morrissette-Brown'. Mobil
EFTA00600054
nly whcn it would achieve a public good transcending the normally predominant principle of utilizing all rational means for ascertaining the truth, Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324 (11" Cir. 2007), citing United States v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 710, 94 S. Ct 3090, 3108, 41 L.Ed. 2d 1039 (1974)( privileg
EFTA00602807
ict -2, this court declines the intervenors' invitation to expand Rule 410 by crafting a federal common law privilege for plea discussions. See e.g. Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324 (11ih Cir. 2007)(declining to recognize medical peer review privilege in federal discrimination cases); Weiss ex reL Est
EFTA00583389
refers to Federal Rule of Evidence 501, which "empower[s] the federal courts to `continue the evolutionary development of [evidentiary] privileges!" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 47 (1980). The "central feature" of Rule 410 "is
EFTA00583739
ed by reference to Fed. R. Evid. 501, which "empower[s] the federal courts to `continue the evolutionary development of [evidentiary] privileges.'" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 47 (1980). The Supreme Court has recognized that
EFTA00584591
efers to Federal Rule of Evidence 501, which "empower[s] the federal courts to `continue the evolutionary development of [evidentiary] privileges!" Adkins v. Christie, 488 F.3d 1324, 1328 (11th Cir. 2007), quoting Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 47 (1980). The "central feature" of Rule 410 "is
EFTA01655381
t children engaged in sexually explicit conduct, and will now face decades in prison to protect children from his exploitation. WISH (CW- 8) (08/25, Adkins) quoted FBI Indianapolis Special Agent in Charge Timothy J. O'Malley: "The exploitation of children is one of the most serious crimes we investigate
EFTA01655511
), and Tampa Free Press (11/05, Hernandez). Continued Reporting: FBI, HSI Indianapolis to Lead New Homeland Security Task Force WISH (CW-8) (11/05, Adkins) reported that FBI Indianapolis is joining forces with the Homeland Security Task Force (HSTF) in a groundbreaking initiative to combat violent crim
EFTA01655846
onths of probation with 12 days of intermittent confinement for his role in the January 6 Capitol riot. According to the article, the FBI found that Adkins had bragged on social media about drinking a Coors Light inside the U.S. Capitol during the riot. The article noted that according to the FBI, Adkin
EFTA01660745
f intermittent confinement, for his involvement in the January 6 Capitol riot. According to the article, the FBI obtained Facebook messages sent by Adkins detailing his plans for the trip to D.C. and his activities on the day, which included entering the Capitol after attending former President Trump's
EFTA01704793
may contact the New York Banking Department to obtain a comparative credit card rates, fees and grace periods by calling 1.800.518-8866. Change of Adkins coned on hail do not use Nano Company None Stnet AdItess CIY, Elate Zy Coe* kneads and Nano Phan* Area Cade and Work Phone Email rt_i_

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
Leon Black
PersonAmerican billionaire businessman (born 1951)

Chris Christie
Person55th Governor of New Jersey and former U.S. Attorney for the District of New Jersey
Roy Black
PersonAmerican lawyer (1945–2025)

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
Martin Weinberg
PersonAmerican attorney (born 1946)
Jane Doe
PersonPseudonym for anonymous victims/witnesses in Epstein legal proceedings

Michael Cohen
PersonAmerican former attorney and former Republican official
the Southern District
LocationFederal judicial district in New York City

Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)

Supreme Court
OrganizationHighest court of jurisdiction in the US
Emmy Taylor
PersonFormer assistant to Ghislaine Maxwell, appeared in Epstein flight logs and court documents
Paden
PersonSurname reference in Epstein-related documents

Kenneth Marra
PersonAmerican judge
Trammel v. United States
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents

Bradley Cooper
PersonAmerican actor
Herman
PersonName reference in Epstein documents

Jay Lefkowitz
PersonAmerican lawyer
Santobello
PersonLegal case citation (Santobello v. New York) in Epstein court documents

Columbia University
LocationPrivate Ivy League research university in New York City