tment in the number of underlying shares or the exercise price, or both. EXAMPLE: An investor bought an XYZ 60 op- tion—either a call or a put—and XYZ Corporation sub- sequently effected a 3 for 2 stock distribution. Instead of covering 100 shares of stock at an exercise price of $60 a share. each outstanding

an adjustment in the number of under- lying shares and the exercise price. EXAMPLE: An investor bought an XYZ 50 option— either a call or a put—and XYZ Corporation subsequently effected a 3 for 2 stock distribution. Instead of covering 100 shares of stock at an exercise price of $50 a share, each outstanding

nment cites stands for no such broad proposition. Rather, that case involved a situation where for two years the Government had been demanding that XYZ Corporation should waive its privileges and produce various documents 23 EFTA00205750 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 106 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/10/2011 P

that no attorney-client information is being sought, the subpoena should be addressed to "John [Jane] Doe, in his/her capacity as secretary of the XYZ Corporation." 264 Form -- Request for Authorization To Issue A Subpoena To An Attorney for Information Relating To Representation of a Client Requests for Aut

he contributing partner (that is, if the asset had basis). See Treas. Reg. section 1.197-2(g)(4) for the general rules. Example 3-8 EFTA00692353 XYZ Corporation owns and operates a broadcasting station which has been in business since 1985. In January 1995, the corporation purchases additional licenses from

RN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (Foley Square - NYC) Gerber Et Al V. The Financial Trust Company Et Al PLAINTIFF: Marvin Gerber; Kalma Koenig DEFENDANT: XYZ Corporation; The Financial Trust Company; Jeffrey E. Epstein; ABC Inc. DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:18cv7580 FILING DATE: 8/20/2018 JURISDICTION: Federal Question

RN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (Foley Square - NYC) Gerber Et Al V. The Financial Trust Company Et Al PLAINTIFF: Marvin Gerber; Kalma Koenig DEFENDANT: XYZ Corporation; The Financial Trust Company; Jeffrey E. Epstein; ABC Inc. DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:18cv7580 FILING DATE: 8/20/2018 JURISDICTION: Federal Question

tment in the number of underlying shares or the exercise price, or both. EXAMPLE: An investor bought an XYZ 60 op- tion—either a call or a put—and XYZ Corporation sub- sequently effected a 3 for 2 stock distribution. Instead of covering 100 shares of stock at an exercise price of $60 a share. each outstanding

an adjustment in the number of under- lying shares and the exercise price. EXAMPLE: An investor bought an XYZ 50 option— either a call or a put—and XYZ Corporation subsequently effected a 3 for 2 stock distribution. Instead of covering 100 shares of stock at an exercise price of $50 a share, each outstanding

e use fictitious names for all affected parties and furnish only such background facts as arc necessary to provide ambiance. In the fall of 1998, XYZ Corporation (XYZ) began distributing a neoteric medic- al device. Soon after distribution began, XYZ learned that, on some occasions, the device was not funct