L 3 RSD1 P 0.00 563 01/03 09:08PM IC M PALM FL 1 RSD1 0 M 0.00 564 01/03 09 55PM IC M PALM FL 1 RSD1 0 M 0.00 565 01/03 11.35PM MIANI. 3 RSD1 O RN 0.00 566 rue 01/04 12 15AM IC N PALM FL 4 RSD1 O II 0.00 567 01/04 12 22AN IC N PALM FL 10 RSD1 O M 0.00 568 01/04

OKI C. 1. RSD1 N PALM Pi 1 RID1 M PALM PL 1 RID1 MAIN FL 7 RID1 N PAIN IL 1 RID1 N PAIN 31. 1 RID1 INCON1 CL I RID1 N011044 It 1 MIDI MIANI PL 1 RID1 laAN1. PL 2 RID1 ICUUCI FL 1 RID1 M PALM ft 1 RID1 M PAIN FL 1 RID1 I cOMI CL 1 RID1 N PALM FL 1 *SDI ImcOmi CL S *SDI N PA

NPA2 P It 0.03 233 12/11 11.01AU M stAtstt FL 2 NVA2 P R 3.03 :34 12/13 11:1 AM INCONI CL 1 NPA2 P IR 2.02 235 12/13 llillAN MIANI FL 3 NPA2 P R 2.00 :36 12/13 11,11AX INCOM' CL 5 NPA2 P IR 2.00 237 12/13 11:2CAM *I PALM F. 2 tl7A2 P R 0.00 238 12/13 12

nces the manifest intent to extort mono' from the addressee. The order of the district court denying the motion of appellant is affirmed. CITY OF MIANI I SUTTON et al. No. 13113. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. April 25,1050. Dnrward B. Sutton and Sarah R. Sutton. cluing bald flOk