of lenity, however, applies only when, after consulting traditional canons of statutory construction, we are left with an ambiguous statute."); cf. Bautista v. State, 863 So. 2d 1180, 1185 n.4 (Fla. 2003) (recognizing that the rule of lenity does not apply where legislative intent to the contrary is cle

Let me know if you should have any questions. Kindest regards, EFTA00555616 Sarah From: Sarah Tay Sent: 24 April 2019 10:22 To: Cc: Lissette Bautista Subject: Smythson Bespoke Stationery Quotation for Ms. Karyna Shuliak Dear Ms. Shuliak, After some research with my production team, here are our

utor's remarks were improper and ... that the remarks, taken in the context of the en- tire trial resu in substantial prejudice." United States I Bautista, 23 F.3d 726, 732 (2d Cir.1994). The challenged comments occurred in response to Fell's endeavor to use the stipu- lation of his offer to plead gu