13
Total Mentions
13
Documents
118
Connected Entities
Organization referenced in documents
EFTA00073260
frey E. Epstein and several Epstein-controlled entities before the Superior Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands. See Exhibit A hereto (USVI's operative First Amended Complaint, filed February 11, 2020). Access to other judicial documents in this action has already been granted to intervening private parties in interest, s
EFTA00077311
frey E. Epstein and several Epstein-controlled entities before the Superior Court of the U.S. Virgin Islands. See Exhibit A hereto (USVI's operative First Amended Complaint, filed February 11, 2020). Access to other judicial documents in this action has already been granted to intervening private parties in interest, s
EFTA00189787
o allow suit by any person who, "while a minor," was a victim of a violation. PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL 9 ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT EFTA00189795 First Amended Complaint or, in the Alternative, for a More Definite Statement (which is attached hereto): A. The applicable version of § 2255 only permits "minor" to sue:
EFTA00201211
he Plaintiff, for the purpose of sexually assaulting the girls and/or coercing them to engage in prostitution in return for the payment of monies. (First Amended Complaint, ¶ 9). The scheme was motivated by the Defendant's sexual preference and obsession for minor girls. Id. Pursuant to the scheme, minor girls, includ
EFTA00201298
8-cv-80811-KAM Document 40 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 35 of 91 C.M.A. vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-C IV-MARRA/JOH NSON First Amended Complaint 84. Pursuant to the agreement, the Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, is in the same position as if he had been tried and convicted of the sexual offenses
EFTA00310004
EFTA00310009 DEFENDANT'S REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS Epstein. et aL v. Fanelli Paneling. Inc. Page 7 statute within its First Amended Complaint. Nevertheless, this statute is lustily utilized in opposing Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on point, to the extend that 5 V.I.C. § 4903(a)(I) & (2)
EFTA00724884
Defendants prays as follows: 2 1. That judgment be entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff. 3 2. That Plaintiff take nothing by his First Amended Complaint and that 4 said First Amended Complaint be dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. 5 3. That Defendant be awarded costs of suit herein. 6 4.
EFTA00788395
king relief from a protective order issued in the Gee v. Maxwell matter ("Protective Order" and "Giuffre Matte?) and ii) to dismiss the plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the above-captioned matter ("Jane Doe Matter"), and b) your request for an opportunity to depose Jeffrey Epstein. As a preliminary matte
EFTA00808515
pstein, through counsel, moves to set-aside the default, which motion is never ruled upon (Res.App. 4, pp.34-36).3 April 13, 2011 Epstein files his First Amended Complaint (App.6) and never moves to default Rothstein. August 22, 2011 Epstein filed the Second Amended Complaint (App.8) which included a claim against E
EFTA00307578
fs are contractually prohibited from suing or initiating, prosecuting, participating in or otherwise pursuing a suit against Molyneux. l A copy of First Amended Complaint filed in J.P. Molynex Studio, Ltd. and Juan Pablo Molyneux v. Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J., LLC filed in the District Court of the Virgin Islands, Div
EFTA00308324
11. Defendant maintains that the Court Granted, in part, its Motion to Dismiss, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)0, with dismissal of the existing First Amended Complaint as the appropriate remedy for the relief requested. 12. Defendant acknowledges, however, that the Court may exercise its discretion to join parti
EFTA00582845
s i) seeking relief from a protective order issued in the v. Maxwell matter ("Protective Order" and "M Matte?) and ii) to dismiss the plaintiff's First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in the above-captioned matter ("Jane Doe Matter"), and b) your request for an opportunity to depose Jeffrey Epstein. As a preliminary matte
EFTA00175214_sub_002 - EFTA00175214_200
ase 9:08-cv-80811-KAM Document 39 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/09/2009 Page 63 of 91 vs. Epstein, et al. Case No.: 08-CV-80811-C IV-MARRA/JOH NSON First Amended Complaint 147. For the second time in April of 2003, again returned to JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S residence at his request. On this occasion, JEFFREY EPSTEIN directe

Jeffrey Epstein
PersonAmerican sex offender and financier (1953–2019)
Jane Doe
PersonPseudonym for anonymous victims/witnesses in Epstein legal proceedings

United States
LocationCountry located primarily in North America
Jack Goldberger
PersonAmerican criminal defense attorney who represented Jeffrey Epstein, partner at Goldberger Weiss P.A. in West Palm Beach, Florida

Bradley Edwards
PersonAmerican attorney who represented Epstein victims, author of Relentless Pursuit

Scarlett Johansson
PersonAmerican actress (born 1984)
Jack Scarola
PersonAmerican attorney who represented Jeffrey Epstein victims, partner at Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley

Kenneth Marra
PersonAmerican judge

Ghislaine Maxwell
PersonBritish socialite and sex trafficker, daughter of Robert Maxwell, accomplice of Jeffrey Epstein
Bruce E. Reinhart
PersonFederal magistrate judge in Southern District of Florida, presided over Epstein case proceedings
V.I.C.
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents
Goldberger & Weiss
OrganizationLaw firm based in Florida
Atterbury
OrganizationLocation or entity referenced in documents
the Superior Court
OrganizationU.S. superior court

Donald Trump
PersonPresident of the United States (2017–2021, 2025–present)
the Protective Order
OrganizationOrganization referenced in documents
Denise Francois
PersonPerson referenced in documents

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley
OrganizationFlorida plaintiffs law firm

Alan Dershowitz
PersonAmerican lawyer, author, and art collector (born 1938)

Lake Worth
LocationCity in Palm Beach County, Florida, United States