duled status conference, they should so notify the Court, in writing, and will be excused from attendance at the conference. 2. Under Rule 88.5 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida it is the duty of counsel to provide the Court with written reports setting forth the speedy Trial status of e

R SEAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO UNSEAL THE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (together, the "Plaintiffs") by and through their undersigne

TION OF MARTIN WEINBERG Pursuant to Rule 4(b) of the Special Rules Governing the Admission and Practice of Attorneys, I certify that I have studied the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Souther District of Florida and that I am a member in good standing of the Massachuset Bar and the Bar of the United States District Court

R SEAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO UNSEAL THE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (together, the "Plaintiffs") by and through their undersigne

Cocom TGtovL FLOW. 33133 EFTA00221960 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 4 Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby moves to file his reply to plaintiffs' responses to his motions for stay, as

Cocom TGtovL FLOW. 33133 EFTA00222403 Case 9:08-cv-80119-KAM Document 37 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/12/2008 Page 2 of 4 Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, defendant Jeffrey Epstein hereby moves to file his reply to plaintiffs' responses to his motions for stay, as

R SEAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STAY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO UNSEAL THE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (together, the "Plaintiffs") by and through their undersigne