dertook before granting the order; and (4) the nature of reliance on the order. In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Litig., 255 F.R.D. 308, 318 (D. Conn. 2009). At a broad level, Mr. Dershowitz has simply not demonstrated the existence of an "extraordinary circumstance or compelling

ndertook before granting the order; and (4) the nature of reliance on the order." In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Ling., 255 F.R.D. 308, 318 (D. Conn. 2009). The first factor—the scope of the Protective Order—favors granting the Government's application for modification. As discusse

ndertook before granting the order; and (4) the nature of reliance on the order." In re Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (EPDM) Antitrust Ling., 255 F.R.D. 308, 318 (1:10. Conn. 2009). The first factor—the scope of the Protective Order—favors granting the Government's application for modification. As discu

Minn. 2014) 4 Charter Oak Fire Ins. Co. v. Electrolux Home Prods., Inc., 287 F.R.D. 130 (E.D.N.Y. 2012) 11, 12 In re EPDM Antitrust Litt., 255 F.R.D. 308 (D. Conn. 2009) 12 Gambale v. Deutsche Bank AG, 377 F.3d 133 (2d Cir. 2004) v. Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433, 2017 WL 1787934 (S.D.N.Y. May 3, 2017)