Chacko appears exclusively as a legal citation in court filings related to the Epstein case. All 4 mentions reference the same case law: United States v. Chacko, 169 F.3d 140, 145 (2d Cir. 1999), which concerns the legal doctrine of multiplicity in criminal indictments.

This entity represents a legal precedent, not a person connected to Jeffrey Epstein. The case United States v. Chacko is cited in multiple court documents (likely different versions of the same motion or brief) to support arguments about the multiplicity doctrine and double jeopardy protections under the Fifth Amendment. The citation appears in legal arguments challenging whether the indictment improperly charged a single offense multiple times. This is a case law reference that legal teams cited when crafting their arguments—Chacko was the defendant in an unrelated 1999 Second Circuit case.

Key Highlights

• •All mentions are identical legal citations to a 1999 Second Circuit case about multiplicity in criminal indictments
• •Appears in at least 3-4 different court documents (likely copies or versions of similar filings)
• •No evidence this represents an actual person connected to Epstein—it's legal precedent being cited by attorneys

Frequently Asked Questions