ntial information, discovery, and sealed materials. 7 The controlling authority relied on by both courts to reach opposite results is Martindell v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291, 293 (2d Cir. 1979). EFTA00018753 --- PAGE BREAK --- The Honorable Alison J. Nathan August 17, 2020 Page 6 There are at least th

ns, both of which were designated "Confidential." Two, the government had no ability legally to obtain the deposition transcripts. In Martindell v. International Telephone and Telegraph Corp., 594 F.2d 291, 293 (2d Cir. 1979), cited with approval in In re Teligent, Inc., 640 F.3d 53, 58 (2d Cir. 2011), the government moved in a civil act