se, or attempting to do so. See for e.g., U.S. v. Gagliardi, 506 F.3d 140, 150-51 (2d Cir. 2007). In Gagliar

gs were removed but new expert required because he saw exemplars containing the spelling errors. 2422(b); 1470 (mail) Not Consummated U.S. v. Gagliardi, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64576 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) Internet Private citizen pretended to be "13 yr- old"; defendant contacted and initiated sexually

on of evidence is not particularly high." United States v. El Gamma!, 831 F. App'x 539, 542 (2d Cir. 2020) (summary order) (quoting United States v. Gagliardi, 506 F.3d 140, 151 (2d Cir. 2007)). Rule 901 is "satisfied if sufficient proof has been introduced so that a reasonable juror could find in favor o

mal.' The testimony of a witness with knowledge that a matter is what it is claimed to be is sufficient to satisfy this standard." United States v. Gagliardi, 506 F.3d 140, 151 (2d Cir. 2007) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). After this low bar is satisfied, "the other party then remains f

e 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Facsimile: December 9, 2008 VIA UNITED STATES MAIL Re: Jeffrey Epstein : Notification of Work Release Dear Ms. Gagliardi: By virtue of this letter, the United States Attorney's Office hereby provides you with notice that the U.S. Attorney's Office has learned that Jef

s were removed but new expert required because lie saw exemplars containing the spelling errors. 2422(b); 1470 (mail) Not Consummated U.S. v. Gagliardi, 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 64576 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) Internet Private citizen pretended to be "13 yr- old"; defendant contacted and initiated sexually