ttle Saint James Island located in the U. S. Virgin Islands, as well as a luxury townhouse in New York City. 8. Based upon representations made by Lambros, Plaintiffs paid Lambros over one Hundred Thirty Five Thousand Dollars to provide to Plaintiffs and install equipment (the "Equipment") of makes an

er: email: September 8, 2011 VIA EMAIL ( II) AND FEDERAL EXPRESS Mr. Nick Lambros Sound X 360 Northwest Highway Barrington, IL 60010 Dear Mr. Lambros: As you know, I represent Jeffrey Epstein and L.S.J., LLC ("Epstein"). I am writing in connection with claims they have against you regarding high-

From: Darren Indyke < To: Lesley Groff Subject: Fwd: Epstein, et al. v. Lambros, et al.- CLIENT COPIES Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 19:23:23 +0000 Attachments: Cover_Letter 08.03.12.pdf For Lambros file Sent from my iPad Begin for

Subject: Fwd: Epstein, et al. v. Lambros, et al.- CLIENT COPIES Date: Fri, 03 Aug 2012 19:23:23 +0000 Attachments: Cover_Letter 08.03.12.pdf For Lambros file Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Nicole Miller < Date: August 3, 2012 3:1 1 :27 PM EDT To: Darren Indyke Cc: Chris Kroblin

t as an attempt to cause delay, arguing the request is premature, and confirming that service was accomplished on March 10, 2012. Because Defendant Lambros was served outside the Virgin Islands, he has thirty (30) days from the date of service to respond to the Complaint, or until April 9, 2012. Ordinar

ated December 4, 2010 for a project total of $181,241.80 and accompanying proposals for each individual project. Based upon representations made by Lambros, Plaintiffs paid Lambros One Hundred Thirty-Five Thousand Nine Hundred Thirty-One Dollars and Thirty-Five Cents ($135,931.35) by wire transfer on D

r, Civ. No.1990-200, 1993 WL 661181, at '2 (D.V.1. Dec. 30, 1993); sec also Marcher v. Nash, 32 F.Supp.2d 239, 241 EFTA00622680 Epstein, et at v. Lambros, et at Case No. ST-l2-CV-2l Motion for Award of Costs and Attorneys' Fees Page 3 (D.V.I.1998). Reasonable attorneys' fees may include charges for

venth Circuit’s ruling in Maddow and treat the tax return information as discoverable under ordinary standards. See also Shearson Lehman Hutton v. Lambros, 135 F.R.D. 195, 198 (M.D.Fla.1990) (ordering disclosure of tax returns because such information was relevant to the parties claims and defenses, r

Accordingly, a total of an additional 4 hours is added to the instant fees sought but not contained in Exhibit A. EFTA00622684 Epstein, of al. v. Lambros, et al Case NO. ST-12-CV-21 Affirmation Paget 4. Based on my review of the.file and the underlying bills, the total and reasonable amount of att

ght Port of Sale, Suite 15-16 St. Thomas, USVI 00802 Telephone: (340) 779-2564 Facsimile: 888 316-9269 Email: EFTA00298125 Epstein, et al. v. Lambros, et al. Civil No. 2012/ 21 Notice of Service of Process Page 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the day of March, 2012, I caused

t as an attempt to cause delay, arguing the request is premature, and confirming that service was accomplished on March 10, 2012. Because Defendant Lambros was served outside the Virgin Islands, he has thirty (30) days from the date of service to respond to the Complaint, or until April 9, 2012. Ordinar