and extraordinary remedy which should be granted sparingly and only after the moving party has alleged and proven facts entitling it to relief. See Shands at Lake Shore, Inc. v. Ferrero, 898 So. 2d 1037, 1038 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Wade v. Brown, 928 So. 2d 1260, 1262 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). As a threshold

0) ("Because the record supports the trial court's judgment on this alternative theory, we conclude that the trial court properly ruled in favor of Shands."); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1979) ("Even when based on erroneous reasoning, a -5- EFTA00612487 concl