revented by Plaintiff. Then, on June 5, 2009, C.M.A. filed a Motion for Protective Order Regarding Treatment Records From Parent-Child Center, Inc. (Susan Pope) and Dr. Serge Thys (DE 114, now DE 207). On June 17, 2009, Plaintiff then filed a subsequent Motion for Protective Order Regarding Treatment Reco

CV-80591-MARRA/JOHNSON CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-MARRA/JOHNSON PLAINTIFF, C.M.A.'S, EMERGENCY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITIONS OF SUSAN POPE AND DR. SERGE THYS AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Plaintiff, C.M.A., by and through her undersigned attorneys, hereby files her Emergency Moti

FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE DEPOSITIONS OF SUSAN POPE AND DR. SERGE THYS THIS CAUSE is before the Cour

er states as follows: In light of the Court's Order Denying Plaintiff, C.M.A.'s Emergency Motion For Protective Order Regarding the Depositions of Susan Pope and Dr. Serge Thys (D.E. 246)("Absent an amended pleading or stipulation of the parties, Plaintiff's unilateral non-binding notice of intent cannot

motion as it relates to Dr. Thys, is denied. In the same Motion at issue here, styled as an emergency, Plaintiff sought to protect the taking of Dr. Susan Pope’s deposition which was then scheduled for the following day, August 6, 2009. As Dr. Pope’s deposition was scheduled to take place the day after the

e to have a meaningful compulsory psychological examination by a defense expert. For example, Defendant's attorneys recently took the deposition of Susan Pope, who counseled Plaintiff for the last 12 years. Significantly, Susan Pope could not identify anywhere in her records from 2003 through 2009 wherein