includes the relevant period in this action and five preceding years. See In re Magnetic Au- diotape Antitrust Litig., 334 F.3d at 207- 08; see also, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 F.3d at 569-70 (holding that the time peri- od relevant for determining extent of a defendant’s contacts for general jurisdic- tion purpose shoul

cludes the relevant period in this action and five preceding years. See In re Magnetic Au- diotape Antitrust Litig., 334 F.3d at 207- 08; see also, Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 F.3d at 569-70 (holding that the time peri- od relevant for determining extent of a defendant's contacts for general jurisdic- tion purpose sho

uestion of law to be decided by this Court. "Statutory interpretation is a matter of law appropriate for resolution on summary judgment." Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 631 F.3d 1153, 1160 (10th Cir. 2011)(citation omitted). "Issues of statutory interpretation and other matters of law may be decided on motion for su

uestion of law to be decided by this Court. "Statutory interpretation is a matter of law appropriate for resolution on summary judgment." Thomas v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. 631 F.3d 1153, 1160 (10th Cir. 2011)(citation omitted). "Issues of statutory interpretation and other matters of law may be decided on motion for su

with the forum [territory] and permits a court to exercise its power in a case where the subject matter of the suit is unrelated to those contacts." Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Robertson•Ceco Corp.. 84 F.3d CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0087593 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00233777 EFTA01386059

the plaintiffs for the loans that are the subject of this litigation — and therefore, are subject to this Court's general jurisdiction. See, e.g., Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 84 F.3d at 569 (finding that "our review of general jurisdiction cases reveals that contacts are commonly assessed over a period of years prior t