ional hearings in which the victims participated, satisfying their CVRA rights. See United States v. BP Prods. N. Am. Inc., 610 F. Supp. 2d 655, 660 (S.D. Tex. 2009). 70 558 F. Supp. 2d 411 (E.D.N.Y. 2008). Tl Td. at 419 (internal citation omitted). Rubin’s suggestion about limitations that apply to pre-i

F. Supp. 3d 44, 52 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) (citing In re Dean, 527 F.3d at 395); United States v. BP Prod. N. Am., Inc., No. H-07-434, 2008 WL 501321, at 11 (S.D. Tex. Feb. 21, 2008) (discussing /8 U.S.C. § 377] and a broad duty to confer before charges are filed). Another district court refused prosecutors' reques

inding precedent in Florida, which is within the Eleventh Circuit. 345 United States v. BP Products North America, Inc., 2008 WL 501321, at *11 (S.D. Tex. 2008). Victims who wished to be heard were permitted to speak at the plea hearing. 346 Dean, 527 F.3d at 394. 347 Before Epstein’s state c