uals pale in comparison with the most unambiguously radical evildoers of the 20-21* century — the dictators Idi Amin, Francisco Franco, Adolf Hitler, Kim Jong-il, Slobodan Milosevic, Pol Pot, Josef Stalin, Charles Taylor, and Mao Zedong. These men were responsible for the brutal deaths of approximately 80 mill

ndestine programs—as if the US nuclear arsenal poses the same danger to international peace and security as do the nuclear arsenals of the regimes of Kim Jong-il or the [ranian clerics. The goal of zero nuclear weapons, often referred to by its sponsors as a “moral imperative,” inevitably delegitimizes and un

tyle":"_anf-ts-10"|],"layout": "default- body", "role": "body", "text":"When the president first visited the U.N., he ridiculed North Korea's leader, Kim Jong-un, as a "rocket man" on a suicide mission and he vowed to rip up the Iran nuclear deal.", "type": "text"," additions": ["URL":"https://apple.news/AnM

always preferable to hard ones, even if the process takes some time. A moral argument can be made that monsters like Muammar el-Qaddafi in Libya and Kim Jong-il in North Korea should be overthrown any way they can, as fast as we can, regardless of the risk of short-term chaos. But that reasoning quickly loses