e Petite Policy, convinced the state prosecutors to impose a more severe punishment than the state believed was appropriate under the circumstances. FAUSA Sloman’s version of the history with respect to the sentence he required Mr. Epstein’s lawyers to seek from the State contradicts his later assertion, which i

CEOS abuse of discretion review is likely flawed as well. Moreover, although the USAO expected, and personally promised to us, an independent review, FAUSA Sloman’s letter also makes clear that our pivotal legal challenge to the use of 18 U.S.C. § 2422(b) had already “been previously raised and thoroughly conside