Epstein Secrets

Cassell and Bradley Edward's representation of Ms. in a long-running pro bono crime victims' rights act case Professor Cassell is handling through the University of Utah appellate clinic, Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736 (filed S.D. Fla. 2008). 3 EFTA00600138 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS D

team. Her desire is, of course, no basis to deny the pending pro hac vice motion. See Richardson-Merrell, Inc. v. Koller, 472 U.S. 424, 441 (1985) (Brennan, J., concurring) ("the tactical use of attorney-misconduct disqualification motions is a deeply disturbing phenomenon in modern civil litigation. W

Nevertheless, I think it is irrelevant because in evaluating the Rule 48 motion, then district Judge Paul G. Cassell — who is now a law professor at the University of Utah and is regarded to be a noted expert in victims' rights — concluded that under the Crime Victims' Rights Act, victims have broad rights that extend t

ndrew; actor Kevin Spacey, famed Harvard, law professor A'ian :Oershow,itz and former Presiqent Bill Clinton-on his jet, dubbed the Lolita Express. Bennan's hard-line stance was. welcomed by young ~omen who for years have been told that Epstein c:ouldn't be touched because Acosta signed off oh the n:on

Procedure 2007 Reporter 2007 Utah L. Rev. 861 * Length: 59852 words Author: Paul G. Cassell* * Professor of Law, S.J. Quinney College of Law of the University of Utah, Judge, U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, 2002-07. Thanks to Sara Sun Beale, Doug Beloof, Doug Berman, Russell Butler, Matt Cannon, Meg G

old State Courts Accountable, 9 Lewis & Clark L. Rev. 647 (2005). 348 Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 598-99 (1977). In his Whalen concurrence, Justice Brennan asserted that if a statute allowed indiscriminate disclosure of personal medical records, "such a deprivation [of privacy] would only be consistent w