Back to Network
5
Shared Docs
2
Same-Page
5 / 5
Mentions
Document Mentions (5 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The distric
that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
(3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The distric
that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857732_p3
that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t
Page: EFTA02857732_p3 →Page EFTA02857732_p9
(3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The distric
Page: EFTA02857732_p9 →Sponsored
2 mentions
Page EFTA02857763_p3
that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t
Page: EFTA02857763_p3 →Page EFTA02857763_p9
(3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The distric
Page: EFTA02857763_p9 →2 mentions
Page EFTA02857810_p3
that the person transported was, in fact, a minor, but need not prove that the defendant was aware of her minority. In conducting its analysis, the Jones Court relied upon cases interpreting sections of Title 21 relating to the distribution of drugs to a minor. See Jones at 540. Those cases have held that t
Page: EFTA02857810_p3 →Page EFTA02857810_p9
(3d Cir. 2004). See also United States v. Garcia-Lopez , 234 F.3d 217, 220 (5th Cir. 2000) (The distric
Page: EFTA02857810_p9 →Sponsored
Mutual Connections (140)
Entities connected to both Jennifer Lopez and Jones Court
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON479 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
LB
Leon Black
PERSON185 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
United States
LOCATION144 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION141 w/ Jennifer·4 w/ Jones
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON124 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON117 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
Marc Rich
PERSON106 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
ET
Emmy Taylor
PERSON102 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
Colorado
LOCATION95 w/ Jennifer·2 w/ Jones
New York
LOCATION84 w/ Jennifer·2 w/ Jones
Barry Diller
PERSON82 w/ Jennifer·2 w/ Jones
Philadelphia
LOCATION78 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION75 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
Alexander Acosta
PERSON73 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
RB
Roy Black
PERSON70 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
CW
Courtney Wild
PERSON54 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
Cleveland
LOCATION49 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
Nelson
PERSON49 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
EV
Evans
PERSON45 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones
Naomi Campbell
PERSON42 w/ Jennifer·5 w/ Jones