Epstein Secrets

04) 7 United States v. Korfant, 771 F.2d 660 (2d Cir.1985) 9 United States v. Laskow, 688 F. Supp. 851 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) 8, 10 United States v. Lopez, 356 F.3d 463 (2d Cir. 2004) 9, 11 United States v. Prisco, 391 F. App'x 920 (2d Cir. 2010) 7 United States v. Rivera, 844 F.2d 916 (2d Cir. 1

blunt the exculpatory significance of Accuser-4's omission; in fact, it underscores it. It is clear from the grand jury testimony of Special Agent Kuyrkendall that the FBI specifically asked Accuser-4 who scheduled her massage appointments 6 The government has provided only two quasi-Brady disclosures in t

not subject to a Court's discretion. See, e.g., Lopez v. Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 241 (2001) (noting Congre

viders can be provided to you, if you so desire. If you or your family is subjected to any intimidation or harassment, please contact Special Agent Kuyrkendall or myself immediately. It is possible that someone working on behalf of the targets of the investigation may contact you. Such contact does not vio

for her work in these cases. • U.S.'. Vladimir Lopez, et al., 11-Cr-80106 • U.S.'. Ketty a, et al.,

auger stopped by to see Karen Atkinson on another matter, he told her that Epstein had been on work release for the past few weeks (Exhibit 82). S/A Kuyrkendall spoke with the work release coordinator who told her that he was led to believe that the USAO and FBI knew that Epstein had applied for the program

A NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED LOPEZ BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN & STUMPF =PA.= Dece

gs/Sexual Activity — Grouped by victim — Testimony re Interviews with the Girls b. Plights — Manifests C. Take Questions D. Call Special Agent Kuyrkendall IL RETURN DOCUMENTS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO SUBPOENAS ISSUED SINCE THE LAST DOCUMENT RETURN. A. Have additional subpoenas been issued on behalf