Epstein Secrets

the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez Defendant also objects to the Magistrate Judge’

returns is not privileged. See United States v. Hubbell Defendant further argues in the alternative tha

ccordingly, the fact that federal tax returns cannot be accessed by the general public does not aid the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez, 794 F. Supp. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 1992). Thus, there are two alternative grounds for holding that Defendant’s assertion of the Fifth Amendment privileg

94-KAM Document 92 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/28/2010 Page 2 of 10 3 Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976) and United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35- 36 (2000). As noted by the Magistrate Judge, “Defendant cannot reasonably and in good faith argue that in producing these documen

the Defendant. Accord Resolution Trust Corp. v. Lopez, 794 F. Supp. 1, 3 (D.D.C. 1992). Thus, there

es, 425 U.S. 391, 410 (1976) and United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35- 36 (2000). As noted by the Mag

A NEYRA JACKIE PERCZEK MARK A.J. SHAPIRO JARED LOPEZ BLACK SREBNICK KORNSPAN STUMPF PA._. July 1

rty's] belief that the papers are those described in the subpoena. Doe, 465 U.S. at 612, quoting Fisher, 425 U.S. at 410:see also United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 40 (2000) (compelled testimony "is not to be found in the documents produced in response tip the subpoena" but is instead "the testimo