Document Mentions (3 shared documents)

EFTA00861062

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

puter in 1 hr Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, "jeffrey E." cjeevacationPgmail.com> wrote: any issues ? Forwarded message From: Michael Wolff Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:52 PM Subject: look at this... To:Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> It will probably have to be cut some and th

any issues ? Forwarded message From: Michael Wolff Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:52 PM Subject: loo

being quoted as saying the NPA was coercive, Kafkaesque, implicitly that it was unfair to you — this will hurt you if CVRA gets to remedy phase and J Marra is exercising any discetion (although we will principally rely on contract and constitutional law) I have inserted red-track comments. I have "over

EFTA00861080

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

puter in 1 hr Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2015, at 4:39 PM, "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> wrote: any issues ? Forwarded message From: Michael Wolff Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:52 PM Subject: look at this... To: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> It will probably have to be cut some and t

any issues ? Forwarded message From: Michael Wolff Date: Sat, Mar 28, 2015 at 4:52 PM Subject: loo

EFTA00861082

3 mentions1 same-page

Page ?Same page

re what you mean. On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 6:33 PM, Martin G. Weinberg c.IM > wrote: Just like another reporter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subject of litigation etc Cassell/Edwards will find a way to insert this into the CVRA case and if god for

rter who claimed to have spoken with you, Michael Wolff will be subpoenad, deposed, his notes the subjec

d against you. I would expect that Edwards would do whatever he could to insert the article into the CVRA case even before the remedy phase to anger J Marra (and attempt thru subpoena to pursue discovery from the reporter eg his notes of interviews with you). The reporter wants to speak with you again, i