n 29, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Martin Weinberg < > wrote: Govt requested additional time to unseal its pleadings in the CVRA case. Not opposed. Allowed by J Marra. New date is 7-5. These are the pleadings that J Marra received under seal, and that were the basis for several disclosures in his 6-19 Order denyin

to a further Cassell attack saying you have no reputational interest to defend. Whether we pre-emptively try through this motion to put in front of J Marra all the good you've done since this case that would be at risk if this historic (and presumptively private stuff) gets to public is something we sh

to a further Cassell attack saying you have no reputationsl interest to defend. Whether we pre-emptively try through this motion to put in front of J Marra all the good you've done since this case that would be at risk if this historic (and presumptively private stuff) gets to public is something we sh

nberg < > wrote: Will do. The timing is not right for me to call - she (or Dexter) have no due dates, no issues, they are just waiting for either J Marra to reso ve a I the open discovery issues (their 14,000 withheld pgs with 6E and privilege issues) or for Cassell to file (after all these years) his

being quoted as saying the NPA was coercive, Kafkaesque, implicitly that it was unfair to you — this will hurt you if CVRA gets to remedy phase and J Marra is exercising any discetion (although we will principally rely on contract and constitutional law) I have inserted red-track comments. I have "over

being quoted as saying the NPA was coercive, Kafkaesque, implicitly that it was unfair to you — this will hurt you if CVRA gets to remedy phase and J Marra is exercising any discetion (although we will principally rely on contract and constitutional law) I have inserted red-track comments. I have "over

d against you. I would expect that Edwards would do whatever he could to insert the article into the CVRA case even before the remedy phase to anger J Marra (and attempt thru subpoena to pursue discovery from the reporter eg his notes of interviews with you). The reporter wants to speak with you again, i

downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also something they are considering. It may or more likely may not get traction with J Marra (see his attached order on Reinhart) but it would at least put before your judge Alan's strong denials and, as important, a distancing of Alan from

downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also something they are considering. It may or more likely may not get traction with J Marra (see his attached order on Reinhart) but it would at least put before your judge Alan's strong denials and, as important, a distancing of Alan from

o downsides. A filing from them on Alan's behalf in the CVRA is also something they are considering. It may or more likely may not get traction with J Marra (see his attached order on Reinhart) but it would at least put before your judge Alan's strong denials and, as important, a distancing of Alan from

y we can conference today or early next week, best to begin to get him focused on what his role will be before J Crow (I can certainly deal with the J Marra legal issues in August but will help to have Roy involved there as well) Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ell

rch 18, 2011, 5:25 PM Lets see what is filed, what remedies they are seeking, whether they are seeking to unseal etc. My own intuitive view is that J Marra would only consider a remedy adverse to JE (as contrasted to the likely remedy against the USAO or a decl judgment that different 3771 standards mus

h Bob. Will talk with Roy about how best to use. There is enough ugliness in her depo that we need to carefully weigh cost/benefit of putting before J Marra. Intervention, motions, filings now due 9-2. Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 20 Park Plaza, Suite 1000 Boston, MA 02116 ell This Electronic Message co

LEGE Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 04:05:20 +0000 i agree - it is risk-free to bring excerpts to US Atty - it is high risk to turn the legal issues before J Marra into a hrg where the Jane Does testify putting the need for an open-ended intervention aside - I will be talking to Roy Martin G. Weinberg, Esq. 2

federal district court". Similarly, the most recent opinion of the Office of Legal Counsel to the Attorney General on the CVRA, provided by you to J Marra, Dkt 90-1, limits the CVRA crime victim rights to occasions where there is the initiation of a federal criminal charge. We have also collected many