Epstein Secrets

and for what purpose. Bryon, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberg, 3

areas that could result in criminal prosecution. Hubbell, 530 U.S. at 35-36. Accordingly, any compelled te

and for what purpose. Bryon, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberg. 36

ances where the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena or production request has a compelled testimonial aspect. See United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Thus, where the existence or location of the requested documents are unknown, or where production would 2 Case 9:08-

and for what purpose. Bryon. Hatless. Schaffer. Reid & Assocs.. Inc. v. State ex rel. Schellenberg. 36

ested documents, as to their authenticity, and as to the defendant's selection of them as meeting the requests for production. ate United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Thus, where the existence or location of the requested documents are unknown, or where production would "implicitly auth

and for what purpose. Bryon, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberg, 36

mpelled testimonial aspect. See United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Thus, where the exis

and for what purpose. Bryon, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberg, 36

ested documents, as to their authenticity, and as to the defendant's selection of them as meeting the requests for production. See United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Thus, where the existence or location of the requested documents are unknown, or where production would "implicitly auth

and for what purpose. Bryon, Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberg, 3

tance where "the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence, Case 9:08-cv-80119-K

and for what purpose. Bryon. Harless, Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel, Schellenberq, 3

tance where "the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena (or production request) has a compelled testimonial aspect." United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 36, 120 S.Ct. 2037, 2043 (2000); see also Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391 (1976); McCormick on Evidence EFTA00222080 Case 9:0

m, and for what purpose. Bryon, Hades& Schaffer, Reid & Assocs., Inc. v. State ex rel. Schellenberg, 36

ances where the act of producing documents in response to a subpoena or production request has a compelled testimonial aspect. See United States v. Hubbell, 530 U.S. 27, 35-36 (2000). Thus, where the existence or location of the requested documents are unknown, fa where production would 2 EFTA00222443