Epstein Secrets

illion figure for 750„ not full retail On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 7:15 PM, clIMI > wrote: Jeffrey, This is an email George sent to Howard, It appears Sikorsky wanted to charge us 12.3m for an off shore machine, I can only imagine the number they will present as a duplicate to you current S76, See email be

te: Mon, 1 Mar 2010 15:42:09 -0500 To: Cc: George Reenstra Subject: Epstein/Sikorsky Possible Transactions I received an e-mail this morning from Mike Jones. He tells me he has a buyer for S/N 750. If that is in fad correct, Jeffrey will net $12.3 million from the sale of the aircraft which seems to be a

ry much doubt that the buyer which Mike Jones presented is for real. I think the deal will collapse. I do think JE has gotten incredible prices from Sikorsky, not sure he would proceed without 750 being sold ....your thoughts. Also I do have another potential client in China I am working but it will be se

ackBerry@ wireless handheld From: "George Reenstra" Date: Wed 24 Mar 2010 16:08:13 -0400 To: Subject: 750 I very much doubt that the buyer which Mike Jones presented is for real. I think the deal will collapse. I do think JE has gotten incredible prices from Sikorsky, not sure he would proceed without 7

: Gcrmon, Howard H SIK Subject: Re: 750 ; <LVJETII I'm not going to get into the middle on the 750 sale, but I have already offered that the whole Sikorsky deal can be reversed if 750 doesn't sell in 30 days. Between that and the discounting we've offered (which goes away on 4/1!), it would be very was

enstra To: Poland, Marc B SIK Cc: Germon, Howard H 51K; IvietI Sent: Mon Mar 29 11:25:08 2010 Subject: 750 As you know I doubted the client that Mike Jones claimed was a buyer. Today I can't seem to get Mike on the phone. Marc, I thought it best we have one voice to JE and since the numbers must come fr