Epstein Secrets

t will unseal it. We believe it to violate both the spirit and the most logical interpretation of the NPA, Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich Palo /duo San Frandsco Shanghai Washington O.C. Kit£ 19439748.2 EFTA00233052 07/29/2011 13:12 FAX e003/004 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP July 29, 2

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated that

t will unseal it. We believe it to violate both the spirit and the most logical interpretation of the NPA, Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington, D.C. K&E 19439748.1 EFTA00586200 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP A. Marie Villafana July 29, 2011 Page 2

tiality agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of F.R.Crim.P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- ICAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated th

t will unseal it. We believe it to violate both the spirit and the most logical interpretation of the NPA, Chicago Hong Kong London Los Angeles Munich Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghai Washington D.C. K&E 19439748.2 EFTA00180295 07/29/2011 13:12 FAX la003/004 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP July 29,

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated tha

t will unseal it. We believe it to violate both the spirit and the most logical interpretation of the NPA, Chicago Hong KOng London Los Angeles Munich Palo Alto San Francisco Shanghei Washington D.C. Ka2 19419748.2 EFTA00230790 07/29/2011 13: 12 FAX e 003/004 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP A. Vit

ty agreement between your Office and Mr. Epstein as well as the provisions of Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e). As to the NPA, you have repeatedly asserted in Doe v United States, No. 9:08-cv-80736- KAM, that the NPA was a confidential document. For instance, in paragraph 6 of Document 14, your own Declaration, you stated tha