Epstein Secrets

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatto 0 mail.com> To: Erdoes, Mary E < ;Jes Staley < Sent: 5/30/2011 8:36:28 AM Subject: fYi I think you should ask Wendall to recall the meeting he had with Sussman and Glenn. Glenn was unequivoc

evacatto 0 mail.com> To: Erdoes, Mary E < ;Jes Staley < Sent: 5/30/2011 8:36:28 AM Subject: fYi I t

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 7:36 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E; Jes Staley Subject: fyi I think you should ask Wendall to recall the meeting he had with Sussman an= Glenn. Glenn was unequivocal., adamant ,and loud in fro

y, May 30, 2011 7:36 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E; Jes Staley Subject: fyi I think you should ask Wendall to

lly not discounted , by my well stated desir= , never to file suit. that should not be a factor in a fair resolution of=both issues. Im not sure if Condren can say Jeffreys claim is worth x- =illion if he were to file a claim , and only x minus„ now that we know h= is unlikely to file T=e information c

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatio mail.com> To: Erdoes, Mary E < > CC: Staley, Jes < Shenker. Nina O" < > Sent: 5/30/2011 12:00:47 PM Subject: Re: fyi thank you On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Erdoes, Mary E v, role.

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire

From: Jeffrey Epstein <jeevacatione mail.com> To: Erdoes, Mary E < CC: Staley, Jes Shenker. Nina O" <[email protected]> Sent: 5/30/2011 12:46:38 PM Subject: Re: fyi info needed, -- managed acct NAV at 10 /05 10

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire

ill have everyone get together this week, if possible. and then we will see what to do from there. Mary From: Jeffrey Epstein To: Erdoes, Mary E; Staley, Jes Sent: Mon May 30 03:36:28 2011 Subject: fyi I think you should ask Wendall to recall the meeting he had with Sussman and Glenn. Glenn was une

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire

From: Condren, James > To: 'leevacatio mailcorre .<' evacation@gmailcom>:Erdoes, Mary E" < CC: Staley, Jes c ;-' , - < E > Sent: 7/21/2011 3:05:52 AM Subject: Re: So we're all clear. I think we should be using the exact numbers instead of conce

From: Condren, James > To: 'leevacatio mailcorre .<' evacation@gmailcom>:Erdoes, Mary E" < CC: Staley, Jes c ;-' , - < E > Sent: 7/21/2011 3:05:52 AM S

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:47 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E Cc: Staley, Jes; Shenker, Nina O Subject: Re: fyi info needed, -- managed acct NAV at 10/05 10 /06. realized value,= .. redemption schedule, we have documnet

ully not discounted , by my well stated desir= , never to file suit. that should not be a factor in a fair resolution of=both issues. Im not sure if Condren can say Jeffreys claim is worth x- =illion if he were to file a claim , and only x minus, now that we know h= is unlikely to file * ****** *******

From: Jeffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 11:01 AM To: Erdoes, Mary E Cc: Staley, Jes; Shenker, Nina O Subject: Re: fyi thank you On Mon Ma 30 2011 at 12:53 P= Erdoes, Mary E > wrote: Jeffrey- Yes, we are going to have Condr

ully not discounted , by my well stated desir= , never to file suit. that should not be a factor in a fair resolution of=both issues. Im not sure if Condren can say Jeffreys claim is worth x- =illion if he were to file a claim , and only x minus, now that we know h= is unlikely to file T=e information c

To: jeevacationeggmail.com[[email protected]]; [email protected][[email protected]]; Condren, James[ ]; Staley, Jes From: Erdoes, Mary E Sent Wed 7/20/2011 7:17:35 AM Subject: Re: for setllement purposed only Let talk today by phone any time today. Mary

To: jeevacationeggmail.com[[email protected]]; [email protected][[email protected]]; Condren, James[ ]; Staley, Jes From: Erdoes, Mary E Sent Wed 7/20/2011 7:17:35 AM Subject: Re: for setllement purposed only Let talk today by phone an

From: "Erdoes, Mary E" To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, "Staley, Jesi CC: "Shenker, Nina O" t> Subject: Re: fyi Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 10:53:40 +0000 Jeffrey- Yes, we are going to have Condren step in here on

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire