all? Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:36:12 +0000 k On Jun 9, 2011, at 11:35 AM, Darren Indyke wrote: > Also, you should follow up with JE about whether Condren got back to him yesterday with a time for the meeting at Condren's offices on Friday. If not, ask JE if you should call Condren's office to find ou

11:35 AM, Darren Indyke wrote: > Also, you should follow up with JE about whether Condren got back to him yesterday with a time for the meeting at Condren's offices on Friday. If not, ask JE if you should call Condren's office to find out. Thanks. > New York, New York > Telephone > Direct: > Fax:

esley Groff <MINII > Subject: Re: 2:30 ok for JE conf call? Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:35:34 +0000 Also, you should follow up with JE about whether Condren got back to him yesterday with a time for the meeting at Condren's offices on Friday. If not, ask JE if you should call Condren's office to find ou

: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 15:35:34 +0000 Also, you should follow up with JE about whether Condren got back to him yesterday with a time for the meeting at Condren's offices on Friday. If not, ask JE if you should call Condren's office to find out. Thanks. Darren K. Indyke Darren K. Indyke, PLLC 301 East 66t

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire

From: Condren, James > To: 'leevacatio mailcorre .<' evacation@gmailcom>:Erdoes, Mary E" < CC: Staley, Jes c ;-' , - < E > Sent: 7/21/2011 3:05:52 AM S

From: Lesley Groff To: Jefffrey Epstein <[email protected]> Subject: Do you want me to tell Darren about Condren? Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:30:45 +0000 would you like me to contact Darren re Condren's request? Begin forwarded message: From: "Condren, James"

From: "Condren, James" < To: "Erdoes, Mary F' <[email protected]> Cc:' < Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:16:19 +0000 [email protected] Sorr

From: Lesley Groff c:MINI > To: t an Subject: Reminder Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 13:18:40 +0000 Reminder Condren and Swieca Sent from my iPhone EFTA00433191

From: "Condren, James" < To: "Erdoes, Mary E" <[email protected]> Cc:' < Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:28:15 +0000 [email protected] I al

From: "Condren, James" To: "Erdoes M E" , [email protected] CC: I < Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:16:19 +0000 Sorry, I had some personal b

From: "Condren, James" < To: "Erdoes, Mary E" [email protected]> CC:' < Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:28:15 +0000 [email protected] I als

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire

rved. ***IS*** ****** ************************ ***** ******* ************* ************************** **it* Begin forwarded message: From: "Condren, James" cz > Date: June 9, 2011 1:04:54 PM EDT To: " Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Yes, Friday at 3 at 270 Park. Why don't the 3 of us meet in the

reserved. *********************************************** ***** irk ***** ** ************ ********** ************ Begin forwarded message: From: "Condren, James" ic: I~> Date: June 9, 2011 1:04:54 PM EDT To: " 1" < Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Yes, Friday at 3 at 270 Park. Why don't the 3 of us me

luding all attachments. Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - @ 2011 Darren K. Indyke, PLLC —All rights reserved. Begin forwarded message: From: "Condren, James" ic: > Date: June 9, 2011 1:04:54 PM EDT To: " Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Yes, Friday at 3 at 270 Park. Why don't the 3 of us meet in th

ed. ******** *********** *************** ********* ** ******* ***************** ********************** **** Begin forwarded message: From: "Condren, James" sc Date: June 9, 2011 1:33:21 PM EDT To: " Subject: Re: Jeffrey Epstein Great, see you then. Original Message From: Darren Indyke To

************************* **it* Begin forwarded message: From: "Getler, Melissa" <I Date: July 29, 2011 5:05:42 PM EDT To: Darren Indyke Cc: "Condren, James" < Subject: FW: Epstein Settlement Agreement Darren: I have attached the Settlement Agreement, as well as a blackline version of the docume

From: "Erdoes, Mary E" To: "'Jeffrey Epstein"' <[email protected]> Cc: "'Lesley Groff" , "Condren, James" Subject: RE: Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:21:45 +0000 Ok I am flying to Chicago later this am but can do now or while in air or there. Jim,

n <jeevacation a mail.com> To: "Erdoes, Mary E" Cc: Lesley Groff Subject: Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:07:36 +0000 I think a call with you , me and Condren today could be very helpful. I would like to try to resolve the Bear Steams issues. Of course it would be for settlement purposes only , and be held

gal is abundantly clear once all the documents are reviewed, as opposed to only what wendalll has. I expressed in no uncertain terms in talking with Condren that I view this as a dispute ( Me vs JPM , in the Bear STearns case) as a family disagreement,. hopefully not discounted , by my well stated desire