Epstein Secrets

hrer ([email protected]) Andrew G. Celli ([email protected]) David Lebowitz ([email protected]) Jay M. Wolman ([email protected]) s/ Nicole Simmons 26 EFTA00791895

her interests can rise to the level of a compelling interest sufficient to overcome any presumption of right to access. See, e.g., United States v. Longueuil, 567 F. App'x 13, 16 (2d Cir. 2014) (holding that district court properly sealed contested documents "as they reflected sensitive information about

s Objections to Unsealing Docket Entries 143, 173, and 199 and to Unsealing Docket Entries 164 and 230 at This Time. via ECF on the following: Is/ Nicole Simmons Nicole Simmons 2 EFTA00075006 Casqakigiegota3R424Pleabigr§eili1W041413t5W1Vgagteaf128If 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF N

he integrity of criminal investigations and the privacy and safety of witnesses and suspects that are part of those investigations. United States v. Longueuil, 567 F. App'x 13, 16 (2d Cir. 2014) (holding that district court properly sealed contested documents "as they reflected sensitive information about

ay M. Wolman Marc J. Randazza RANDAZZA LEGAL GROUP, PLLC 100 Pearl Street, 14th Floor Hartford, CT 06103 [email protected] [email protected] Is/ Nicole Simmons Nicole Simmons 2 EFTA00022962 --- PAGE BREAK --- casair.q.e2et43-(EgkirneDiAgtheAillt?Nilielf3tti§h.V2ea :., 0f1.2f9f 17 UNITED STATES DISTRIC

he integrity of criminal investigations and the privacy and safety of witnesses and suspects that are part of those investigations. United States v. Longueuil, 567 F. App'x 13, 16 (2d Cir. 2014) (holding that district court properly sealed contested documents "as they reflected sensitive information about