Epstein Secrets

APC=S8AccessionNo=OB00000020110312e73d0004c • The Daily Telegraph. MEDIA Anicle.United Kingdom.Headline:HE DOES THE JOB WE ASK OF HIM: Whatever the Dukes private indiscretions, when it comes to promoting Britain's trade interests his vigour cant be faulted. says Praveen Swami, http://global.factiva.c

durarticle.asp?NAPC=S&AccessionNo=PMBP000020100622e66j0000rn • Palm Beach Daily News, MEDIA Article,United States,Headline:Epstein settles suit with Jane Doe terms confidential, http://global.factiva.conVen/du/article.asp7NAPC=S8AccessionNo=PBDN000020100702e67100009 • The Palm Beach Post, MEDIA Article

preclusion of all documents and discussion of the Jane Doe 102 case, including the settlement of those claim

ney Corp., 257 N.Y.S.2d 706 (1st Dept. 1965)35 Sidor v. Reno, 95 CIV. 9588 (KMW), 1998 WL 164823, *2 (S.D.N.Y. April 7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) oo. ceiceeccssseeseceseesseeeseesseeeeecseessaeeseeesneeees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir,

ceceseccecusececusseccsssecesssseescsseeeceseesenssseeestsssessnsaseess 25 17. The Parties agree to preclusion of all documents and discussion of the Jane Doe 102 case, including the settlement of those claims (Motion in Limine 17) ................0005 26 18. The Cassell/Edwards v. Dershowitz litigation is

ney Corp., 257 N.Y.S.2d 706 (1st Dept. 1965)35 Sidor v. Reno, 95 CIV. 9588 (KMW), 1998 WL 164823, *2 (S.D.N.Y. April 7, 1998)... 25 United States v. Dukes, 727 F.2d 34, 37 (2d Cir. 1984) o.oo ccecccecccccccceccceesccessscssseecneeeesstecsseeenees 17 United States v. Hatchett, 918 F.2d 631, 641 (6th Cir.