Epstein Secrets

rtin Hamilton-Smith and Marshall declared a leadership spill against Redmond and Williams.18)194 In a partyroom ballot occurred on 23 October 2012, Redmond retained the leadership by one vote; however, Marshall was elected to the deputy leadershipisincilinIMarshall was denied his preferred treasury port

EFTA00262299 LI ZUIZZ. itaa MNt V Pau., vi imps. •••• • • • week before the 2010 election for not being Willing to publicly refuse challenging Redmond for the leadership and faced accusations, particularly by Hamilton-Smith, of derailing the Liberal campaign, with "Chapman Could Challenge" posters

tfolios, while retaining his roles in industry and trade, defence, small business and science.041 Leader of the Opposition On 31 January 2013 after Redmond resigned as Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the SA Lib it was speculated that Marshall would succeed her*t the ballot on 4 Februa arshal wa

when the case comes to court.11311 On February 21, 2019, in the case of Two Jane Does u. United States, Senior Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Kenneth Marra said federal prosecutors violated the law by failing to notify victims before they allowed him to plead guilty to only the

rtin Hamilton-Smith and Marshall declared a leadership spill against Redmond and Williams.181191 In a partyroom ballot occurred on 23 October 2012, Redmond retained the leadership by one vote; however, Marshall was elected to the deputy leadership.lsE701f11J Marshall was denied his preferred treasury po

folios, while retaining his roles in industry and trade, defence, small business and science.(141 Leader of the Opposition On 31 January 2013 after Redmond resigned as Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the SA Liberals, it was speculated that Marshall would succeed herikt the ballot on 4 February 20

when the case comes to court.' 8l On February 21, 2019, in the case of Two Jane Does v. United States, Senior Judge of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida Kenneth Main said federal prosecutors violated the law by failing to notify victims before they allowed him to plead guilty to only the t

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 8 of 11 interests to outweigh the need for probative evidence."Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 9-19,116 S. Ct.1923, 135 L.Ed. 2d 337 (1996); Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 47,100 S. Ct. 906, 63 L.Ed.2d 186 (1980). Recogn

rsary. The United States Attorneys' office, at that juncture, was reviewing evidence relating to Epstein' sexual crimes against minor females within the Southern District of Florida and 6 EFTA00600059 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 188 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/18/2013 Page 7 of 11 deliberating the filing of rele

ted in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee' Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

AMERICA, Defendant, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Intervenors-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, Unit

ted in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee' Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

AMERICA, Defendant, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Intervenors-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, Unit

d in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

AMERICA, Defendant, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Intervenors-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, Unit

ed in the imperative for confidence and trust, the evidentiary benefit of the denial of the privilege, and any consensus among the states, Jaffee'. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10-15, 116 S. Ct. 1923, 1928-31 (1996)—but none of these considerations weighs in favor of recognizing a new privilege to prevent disco

AMERICA, Defendant, ROY BLACK, MARTIN G. WEINBERG, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Intervenors-Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida (April 18, 2014) Before PRYOR and MARTIN, Circuit Judges, and HONEYWELL,* District Judge. * Honorable Charlene Edwards Honeywell, Unit

8713 EFTA00264405 Mira 8:53 AM 4CV 1 C-K- I C"Pman wildPeala week before the 2010 election for not being willing to publicly refuse challenging Redmond for the leadership and faced accusations, particularly by Hamilton-Smith, of derailing the Liberal campaign, with "Chapman Could Challenge" posters

k, New Mexico, Palm Beach, and the United States Virgin Islands. Maxwell called her a liar. Giuffre sued kaxwell for aefimation in federal court in the Southern District of New York in 2015. While details of the settlement have not been made public, in May 2017 the case was settled in Giuffre's favour,16s1 with Maxwe

in evidence as proof of guilt." Herman, 544 F.2d at 797. Plea negotiations are "rooted in the imperative need for confidence and trust," Jaffee v. Redmond, 518 U.S. 1, 10 (1996), and maintaining their confidentiality advances significant public and private interests. Numerous courts have recognized a

013 (Doc. 188), Exhibit A hereto, ordering disclosure to plaintiffs of the intervenor attorneys' written communications with federal prosecutors in the Southern District of Florida made with the specific purpose of obtaining a favorable resolution of the criminal investigation of Jeffrey Epstein through attorney-t