Epstein Secrets

f Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: [email protected] (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: [email protected] (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

on the attached service list this 2nd day of November, 2010. I HEREBY CERTIFY that I am admitted to the Bar of the United State District Court for the Southern District of Florida and I am in compliance with the additional qualifications to practice in this court set forth in Local Rule 2090-1(A). FARMER, JAFFE, WE

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Steven J. Solomon, Esq. Gray Robinson, P.A. 20 EFTA00708312 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 04/08/11 Page 21 of 23 Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Michael I. Goldberg, Esq. Las Olas Centre - Suite 1600 (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) LMB Funding G

cy for RRA to administer the firm's assets and claims. 22. On July 20, 2010, Bradley Edwards received a letter from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida — the office responsible for prosecuting Rothstein's Ponzi scheme. The letter indicated that law enforcement agencies had determined that

ble Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Michael I. Goldberg, Esq.

morializing the agreement. It never did. Instead, Epstein decided to launch litigation in yet another forum — the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida. On July 14, 2010, Epstein filed a Motion to Compel production of numerous documents from Trustee Stettin in the bankruptcy proceeding b

we have no 9 control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring 10 them to cooperate in any sense. 11 I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. 12 Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last 13 night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is 14 Mr.

ancial status comes from the very cases that are in the 19 Second Circuit, and that's the words that the Second Circuit 20 and district courts in the Southern District use. And I quote 21 from Tillery: No evidence as to defendant's financial status 22 may be presented to the jury during the first phase of the 2

itions, but we have no control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' for

the financial status comes from the very cases that are in the Second Circuit, and that's the words that the Second Circuit and district courts in the Southern District use. And I quote from Tillery: No evidence as to defendant's financial status may be presented to the jury during the first phase of the trial by

ositions, but we have no control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' for

the financial status comes from the very cases that are in the Second Circuit, and that's the words that the Second Circuit and district courts in the Southern District use. And I quote from Tillery: No evidence as to defendant's financial status may be presented to the jury during the first phase of the trial by e