y kind of evidence against Prof. Dershowitz. See, Coquina Investments, 760 F.3d at 1310 (11th Cir. 2014). Conclusion I

f Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: [email protected] (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: [email protected] (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL)

(VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Steven J. Solomon, Esq. Gray Robinson, P.A. 20 EFTA00708312 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 1603 Filed 04/08/11 Page 21 of 23 Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Michael I. Goldberg, Esq. Las Olas Centre - Suite 1600 (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) LMB Funding G

ble Intervivos Trust of Ira Sochet do Phil Hudson, Esq. 200 South Biscayne Blvd, Suite 3600 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Coquina Investments do Patricia A. Redmond, Esq. 150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2200 Miami, Florida 33130 E-Mail: (VIA CM/ECF and EMAIL) Michael I. Goldberg, Esq.

we have no 9 control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring 10 them to cooperate in any sense. 11 I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. 12 Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last 13 night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is 14 Mr.

ositions, but we have no control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' for

itions, but we have no control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' for