Epstein Secrets

we have no 9 control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring 10 them to cooperate in any sense. 11 I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. 12 Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last 13 night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is 14 Mr.

ask that the Court simply apply the law in 25 Tillery. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00794661 107 H3v1giu2 1 Oh, Ms. Menninger reminds me, your Honor -- and I 2 think the Court and I are on the same page on this as well -- 3 the tax argument made by Mr. Cassell. Indeed, Ms

itions, but we have no control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' for

, P.C. (212) 805-0300 EFTA00612355 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 H3v1giu2 107 Oh, Ms. Menninger reminds me, your Honor -- and I think the Court and I are on the same page on this as well -- the tax argument made by Mr. Cassell. Indeed, Ms. Maxw

ositions, but we have no control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' for

CT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011409 10 id. 12 13 14 L5 16 ne) 18 life) 20 21 22 23 24 25 107 H3vlgiu2 Oh, Ms. Menninger reminds me, your Honor -- and I think the Court and I are on the same page on this as well -- the tax argument made by Mr. Cassell. Indeed, Ms. Max