Epstein Secrets

3 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (I I th Cir.1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all cases decided by the Fifth Circuit, prior to October I, 1981. 9 114428178.1 EFTA00793928 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6355 Filed 04/11/18 Page 10 of 17 adequately resolved by agreeme

e any detail—much less an unequivocal command—as to what Fowler White is to do with the disc at issue. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Although L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe have sought to join in the motion for order to show cause, they have not been granted leave to intervene in this action. The motion to

nner v. City of Pritchard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 & 1209 (11i° Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent the decisions of the Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981. 3 EFTA_R1_00012688 EFTA01734468 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/0312010 Page

follows: The names of all of the victims are unknown to the plaintiff at this time. However, they include Jane Doe herself as well as the victim in E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein and L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein. A list of more than 30 such minor females has previously been provided by the U.S. Attorney's Offic

nner v. City of Pritchard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1207 & 1209 (11i° Cir. 1981) (en bane), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent the decisions of the Fifth Circuit rendered prior to October 1, 1981. 3 EFTA_R1_02213296 EFTA02725753 Case 9:08-cv-80893-KAM Document 125 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/0312010 Page

follows: The names of all of the victims are unknown to the plaintiff at this time. However, they include Jane Doe herself as well as the victim in E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein and L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein. A list of more than 30 such minor females has previously been provided by the U.S. Attorney's Offic

of a public court proceeding or the right to restitution. In her memorandum, petitioner relics upon In Re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), where the Fifth Circuit held that the CVRA required the government to "confer in some reasonable way with the victims before ultimately exercising its broad discretion." Id

ATE OF FLORIDA, E.W., THE PALM BEACH POST, B.B, Respondents. E.W.'S SEALED REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Respondent, E.W., would show the Court as follows: 1. This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this petition. The order under review is a non-final order for which no