Epstein Secrets

etter to your predecessor in connexion with the • Epstein inquiry. I hope that it now may be of some use to you. Since it was written, Lord (Peter) Mandelson has sought a major international position, as head of the World Trade Organization. He would therefore find it even more difficult to resist any re

ons you, and other law enforcement personnel may wish to put to him. You might also find it useful to seek information from the British politician Peter Mandelson (Lord Mandelson). Perhaps you have already taken this course. Although not as deep a relationship as Andrew's, Mandelson's intimacy with Epstein la

ion from the British politician Peter Mandelson (Lord Mandelson). Perhaps you have already taken this course. Al

England Telephone 1 US Attorney for the Southern District of New York New York City NY 10007 USA Dear June 23, 2020 I sent the enclosed letter to your predecessor in connexion with the • Epstein inqui

25 ii EFTA00595584 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 15 Filed 12/01/15 Page 3 of 29 Cases Abrams v. United States, 250 U.S. 616, 630 (1919) 17 Adelson v. Harris, 973 F. Supp.2d 467, 477 (S.D.N.Y. 2013) 7 Armstrong v. Simon & Schuster, Inc., 625 N.Y.S.2d 477 (1995) 7 Ashcroft v. lqbal, 129 S. Ct.

he U.S. Attorney's Office (Comp1.11 11-13), the litigation concerning the Crime Victim's Rights Act (CVRA) still pending in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida (Compl. 11 15-16), and not Plaintiff's 2009 civil suit against Mr. Epstein (Compl. ¶¶ 17-21). No criminal charges were ever brought agai

ork street 20 that, "I am referring to the statement that we made." As we 21 set forth in our summary judgment brief, this Court's ruling in 22 Adelson v. Harris is directly on point, that a mere reference 23 to another writing that contains defamatory statements does not 24 constitute an actiona

403. Whether or not Ms. ever 6 used drugs while not being abused by defendant does not go to 7 any claim or defenses in this case. 8 Courts in the Southern District of New York routinely 9 exclude evidence of prior drug use under both of these rules, 10 as fully briefed in the papers. Defendant attempts to ad

t on a New York street that, "I am referring to the statement that we made." As we set forth in our summary judgment brief, this Court's ruling in Adelson v. Harris is directly on point, that a mere reference to another writing that contains defamatory statements does not constitute an actionable repe

le 403. Whether or not Ms. Giuffre ever used drugs while not being abused by defendant does not go to any claim or defenses in this case. Courts in the Southern District of New York routinely xclud vidence of prior drug use under both of these rules, as fully briefed in the papers. Defendant attempts to admit this ev